El-Sayeh H G, Morganti C
Harrogate District Hospital, Briary Wing, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, West Yorkshire, UK, HG2 7SX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD004578. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004578.pub3.
Treatment of people with schizophrenia using older typical antipsychotic drugs such as haloperidol can be problematic. Many fail to respond to these older antipsychotics and more people experience disabling adverse effects. Aripiprazole is said to be one of a new generation of atypical antipsychotics with good antipsychotic properties and minimal adverse effects.
To evaluate the effects of aripiprazole for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (September 2005) which is based on regular searches of BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials. We contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, the FDA and authors of trials for additional information.
All clinical randomised trials comparing aripiprazole with placebo, typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.
We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).
Despite the fact that 7110 people participated in fifteen randomised aripiprazole studies, we were unable to extract any usable data on death, service outcomes, general functioning, behaviour, engagement with services, satisfaction with treatment; economic outcomes or cognitive functioning. Study attrition was very large and data reporting poor. Compared with placebo, aripiprazole significantly decreased relapse in both the short and medium term (n=300, 1 RCT, RR 0.66 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 5 CI 4 to 8). It also produced better compliance with study protocol (n=2271, 8 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.5 to 0.97, NNT 26 CI 16 to 239). Aripiprazole may decrease prolactin levels below that expected from placebo (n=305, 1 RCT, RR 0.32 CI 0.1 to 0.8, NNT 14 CI 11 to 50). Compared with typical antipsychotics there were no significant benefits for aripiprazole with regards to global state, mental state, quality of life or leaving the study early. Both groups reported similar rates of adverse effects, with the exception of akathisia (n= 955 RR 0.31 CI 0.2 to 0.6, NNT 20 CI 17 to 32) and the need for antiparkinson medication (n=1854, 4 RCTs, RR 0.45 CI 0.3 to 0.6, NNT 4 CI 3 to 5) which were lower in those receiving aripiprazole. When compared with olanzapine and risperidone, aripiprazole was no better or worse on outcomes of global state and leaving the study early. The rates of adverse effects were also similar, with the exception of less elevation of prolactin (n=301, 1 RCT, RR 0.04 CI 0.02 to 0.1, NNT 2 CI 1 to 2.5) and less prolongation of the average QTc (30 mg/day) (n=200, 1 RCT, WMD -10.0, CI -16.99 to -3.0) compared with risperidone. When compared with standard care (mixed group receiving typical and atypical antipsychotics) one aripiprazole study did have significantly less people not responding to treatment (n=1599, RR 0.70 CI 0.7 to 0.8, NNT 5 CI 4 to 6 ), not satisfied with care (n=1599, RR 0.62 CI 0.6 to 0.7, NNT 4 CI 4 to 5) and less people leaving the study early (n=1599, 1 RCT, RR 0.81 CI 0.7 to 0.9, NNT 13 CI 8 to 39). Results from the five new papers identified from the updated review search, did not significantly alter the main results or conclusions of the original review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole may be effective for the treatment of schizophrenia, but it does not differ greatly from typical and atypical antipsychotics with respect to treatment response, efficacy or tolerability. In comparison with typical antipsychotics, aripiprazole may have a lower risk of akathisia, and in comparison to atypical antipsychotics, less risk of raised prolactin and prolongation of the QTc interval. Clearly reported pragmatic short, medium and long term randomised controlled trials should be undertaken to determine its position in everyday clinical practice.
使用氟哌啶醇等较老的传统抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症患者可能存在问题。许多患者对这些传统抗精神病药物没有反应,更多的人会出现致残性不良反应。阿立哌唑据说是新一代非典型抗精神病药物之一,具有良好的抗精神病特性且不良反应最小。
评估阿立哌唑对精神分裂症和精神分裂症样精神病患者的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组注册库(2005年9月),该注册库基于对BIOSIS、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和PsycINFO的定期检索。我们检查了所有已识别研究的参考文献以寻找进一步的试验。我们联系了相关制药公司、美国食品药品监督管理局以及试验作者以获取更多信息。
所有比较阿立哌唑与安慰剂、传统或非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和精神分裂症样精神病的临床随机试验。
我们独立提取数据。对于同质二分数据,我们计算随机效应、相对风险(RR)、95%置信区间(CI),并在适当情况下,基于意向性分析计算治疗所需人数(NNT)。对于连续数据,我们计算加权平均差(WMD)。
尽管有7110人参与了15项阿立哌唑随机研究,但我们无法提取关于死亡、服务结局、总体功能、行为、服务参与度、治疗满意度、经济结局或认知功能的任何可用数据。研究失访率非常高,数据报告质量差。与安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑在短期和中期均显著降低复发率(n = 300,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.66,CI 0.5至0.8,NNT 5,CI 4至8)。它还使研究方案的依从性更好(n = 2271,8项随机对照试验,RR 0.72,CI 0.5至0.97,NNT 26,CI 16至239)。阿立哌唑可能会使催乳素水平降至低于安慰剂预期的水平(n = 305,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.32,CI 0.1至0.8,NNT 14,CI 11至50)。与传统抗精神病药物相比,阿立哌唑在总体状态、精神状态、生活质量或提前退出研究方面没有显著优势。两组报告的不良反应发生率相似,但静坐不能(n = 955,RR 0.31,CI 0.2至0.6,NNT 20,CI 17至32)和抗帕金森药物需求(n = 1854,4项随机对照试验,RR 0.45,CI 0.3至0.6,NNT 4,CI 3至5)在接受阿立哌唑治疗的患者中较低。与奥氮平和利培酮相比,阿立哌唑在总体状态和提前退出研究的结局方面没有更好或更差。不良反应发生率也相似,但与利培酮相比,催乳素升高较少(n = 301,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.04,CI 0.02至0.1,NNT 2,CI 1至2.5),平均QTc(30毫克/天)延长较少(n = 200,1项随机对照试验,WMD -10.0,CI -16.99至-3.0)。与标准治疗(接受传统和非典型抗精神病药物的混合组)相比,一项阿立哌唑研究中对治疗无反应的人数显著较少(n = 1599,RR 0.70,CI 0.7至0.8,NNT 5,CI 4至6),对治疗不满意的人数较少(n = 1599,RR 0.62,CI 0.6至0.7,NNT 4,CI 4至5),提前退出研究的人数较少(n = 1599,1项随机对照试验,RR 0.81,CI 0.7至0.9,NNT 13,CI 8至39)。更新综述检索中识别出的五篇新论文的结果并未显著改变原始综述的主要结果或结论。
阿立哌唑可能对精神分裂症治疗有效,但在治疗反应、疗效或耐受性方面与传统和非典型抗精神病药物没有太大差异。与传统抗精神病药物相比,阿立哌唑可能静坐不能风险较低,与非典型抗精神病药物相比,催乳素升高和QTc间期延长风险较低。应开展报告清晰的实用短期、中期和长期随机对照试验,以确定其在日常临床实践中的地位。