Suppr超能文献

由针对Doa抗原的抗体引起的反复急性溶血性输血反应,交叉配血未检测到。

Recurrent acute hemolytic transfusion reactions by antibodies against Doa antigens, not detected by cross-matching.

作者信息

Baumgarten Ruben, van Gelder Warry, van Wintershoven Joyce, Maaskant-Van Wijk Petra A, Beckers Erik A M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry & Hematology, Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2006 Feb;46(2):244-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00707.x.

Abstract

An 81-year-old male patient suffered from recurrent acute hemolytic transfusion reactions after transfusion with phenotyped cross-match-negative red blood cells (RBCs). Extensive posttransfusion workup eventually revealed Dombrock (a) (Do(a)) antibodies. Because commercially available cell panels do not allow for identification of anti-Do(a) and owing to the lack of Do(a) typing serum samples, selection of matched units of RBCs is dependent on negative cross-match results. In this case, selection of Do(a-) units by cross-matching failed, indicating that serologic methods were not reliable. A polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific priming assay was used to detect DOA and DOB alleles, which encode Do(a) and Do(b) antigens, respectively. The patient was confirmed to be DOB/DOB by DNA sequencing. Furthermore, the involved mismatched units in each of the three hemolytic episodes were shown to be Do(a+). In the presenting case, DNA typing appeared to be superior to serologic methods in selecting matched RBC units in the presence of anti-Do(a).

摘要

一名81岁男性患者在输注血型匹配且交叉配血阴性的红细胞(RBC)后反复发生急性溶血性输血反应。广泛的输血后检查最终发现了唐德洛克(a)(Do(a))抗体。由于市售的细胞板无法识别抗Do(a),且缺乏Do(a)分型血清样本,匹配红细胞单位的选择依赖于交叉配血阴性结果。在该病例中,通过交叉配血选择Do(a-)单位失败,这表明血清学方法不可靠。采用序列特异性引物聚合酶链反应检测分别编码Do(a)和Do(b)抗原的DOA和DOB等位基因。通过DNA测序确认该患者为DOB/DOB。此外,在三次溶血发作中,每次涉及的不匹配单位均显示为Do(a+)。在本病例中,在存在抗Do(a)的情况下,DNA分型在选择匹配红细胞单位方面似乎优于血清学方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验