Klein Allan L, Grimm Richard A, Jasper Susan E, Murray R Daniel, Apperson-Hansen Carolyn, Lieber Elizabeth A, Black Ian W, Davidoff Ravin, Erbel Raimund, Halperin Jonathan L, Orsinelli David A, Porter Thomas R, Stoddard Marcus F
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):380-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.011.
Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. We compared a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy with a conventional strategy in patients with AF > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month follow-up.
The ACUTE study was a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, with 1222 patients. Six-month follow-up was available in 1034 patients (85%), 525 in the TEE group and 509 in the conventional group. The primary composite end points were cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism at 6 months, which was a prespecified time point. Secondary end points were hemorrhage, mortality, and sinus rhythm.
At 6 months, there was no difference in composite embolic events between the TEE group and the conventional group (10 [2%] vs 4 [0.8%]; risk ratio (RR) 2.47, 95% CI 0.78-7.88; P = .11). However, the hemorrhagic rate was significantly lower in the TEE group (23 [4.4%] vs 38 [7.5%]; RR 0.58, 96% CI 0.35-0.97; P = .04). There was no difference between the 2 treatment groups in all-cause mortality (21 [4%] vs 14 [2.8%]; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.76-2.92; P = .25) and in the occurrence of normal sinus rhythm between the 2 groups (305 [62.2%] vs 280 [58.1%]; P = .51). Sinus rhythm at 6 months was more common in the TEE-guided group, in those patients who had direct current cardioversion (238 [62.5%] vs 151 [53.9%]; P = .03).
The TEE-guided strategy may be considered a clinically effective alternative to a conventional anticoagulation strategy for patients with AF of > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month period.
心房颤动(AF)患者进行电复律与中风风险增加相关。我们比较了经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导策略与传统策略在持续时间超过2天的AF患者进行电复律后的6个月随访中的效果。
急性研究是一项多中心、随机临床试验,有1222例患者。1034例患者(85%)获得了6个月的随访,TEE组525例,传统组509例。主要复合终点是6个月时的脑血管意外、短暂性脑缺血发作和外周栓塞,这是一个预先设定的时间点。次要终点是出血、死亡率和窦性心律。
6个月时,TEE组和传统组的复合栓塞事件无差异(10例[2%]对4例[0.8%];风险比(RR)2.47,95%可信区间0.78 - 7.88;P = 0.11)。然而,TEE组的出血率显著更低(23例[4.4%]对38例[7.5%];RR 0.58,96%可信区间0.35 - 0.97;P = 0.04)。两个治疗组在全因死亡率(21例[4%]对14例[2.8%];RR 1.48,95%可信区间0.76 - 2.92;P = 0.25)以及两组之间窦性心律的发生情况(305例[62.2%]对280例[58.1%];P = 0.51)方面无差异。在接受直流电复律的患者中,TEE引导组6个月时的窦性心律更常见(238例[62.5%]对151例[53.9%];P = 0.03)。
对于持续时间超过2天的AF患者进行6个月的电复律,TEE引导策略可被视为传统抗凝策略的一种临床有效替代方案。