Messina Julia A, Cheng Su-Chun, Franc Benjamin L, Charron Martin, Shulkin Barry, To Bao, Maris John M, Yanik Gregory, Hawkins Randall A, Matthay Katherine K
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 Dec;47(7):865-74. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20777.
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of two semi-quantitative scoring systems to assess response to (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) therapy in recurrent neuroblastoma.
Diagnostic mIBG scan pairs (n = 57) were collected for patients who underwent (131)I-mIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. Two scoring systems were designated: Method 1, which divided the body into nine segments to view osteomedullary lesions with an additional tenth segment to assess soft tissue involvement; and Method 2, which divided the body into seven segments without a corresponding compartment for soft tissue involvement. Four nuclear medicine physicians independently assigned extension and intensity scores utilizing both methods, and separately recorded their impression of whether the post-therapy scan had improved, not changed, or worsened. Inter- and intra-observer concordance and correlation with overall response and progression-free survival (PFS) were performed.
Method 1 produced the highest inter-observer concordance and was used to calculate the relative extension scores (post-therapy score divided by pre-therapy score), which correlated significantly with overall response. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (n = 21) had lower relative extension scores, compared to those without response (P < 0.001). The readers' overall impression associated highly (P < 0.001) with the relative extension scores though results were less quantitative. Concordance was higher if initial scores were >5. Relative extension score did not predict PFS.
Semi-quantitative scoring of mIBG scans provides a more reliable method of assessing response in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma than qualitative impression. The reproducibility and high inter-observer concordance makes mIBG score an important component of overall response criteria in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma.
本研究旨在确定两种半定量评分系统评估复发性神经母细胞瘤对碘-131间碘苄胍(mIBG)治疗反应的准确性。
收集了接受碘-131 mIBG治疗复发性神经母细胞瘤患者的诊断性mIBG扫描图像对(n = 57)。指定了两种评分系统:方法1,将身体分为九个节段以观察骨髓病变,并增加第十个节段以评估软组织受累情况;方法2,将身体分为七个节段,没有对应评估软组织受累情况的分区。四名核医学医师分别使用这两种方法独立给出扩展和强度评分,并分别记录他们对治疗后扫描图像改善、未改变或恶化的印象。进行了观察者间和观察者内的一致性分析以及与总体反应和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性分析。
方法1产生了最高的观察者间一致性,并用于计算相对扩展评分(治疗后评分除以治疗前评分),该评分与总体反应显著相关。与无反应的患者相比,达到完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR)的患者(n = 21)相对扩展评分较低(P < 0.001)。尽管结果的定量性较差,但读者的总体印象与相对扩展评分高度相关(P < 0.001)。如果初始评分>5,则一致性更高。相对扩展评分不能预测PFS。
与定性印象相比,mIBG扫描的半定量评分提供了一种更可靠的评估复发性神经母细胞瘤患者反应的方法。mIBG评分的可重复性和高观察者间一致性使其成为复发性神经母细胞瘤患者总体反应标准的重要组成部分。