Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Dec;65(12):e27417. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27417. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is sensitive and specific for detecting neuroblastoma. The extent of MIBG-avid disease is assessed using Curie scores. Although Curie scoring is prognostic in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, there is no standardized method to assess the response of specific sites of disease over time. The goal of this study was to develop approaches for Curie scoring to facilitate the calculation of scores and comparison of specific sites on serial scans.
We designed three semiautomated methods for determining Curie scores, each with increasing degrees of computer assistance. Method A was based on visual assessment and tallying of MIBG-avid lesions. For method B, scores were tabulated from a schematic that associated anatomic regions to MIBG-positive lesions. For method C, an anatomic mesh was used to mark MIBG-positive lesions with automatic assignment and tallying of scores. Five imaging physicians experienced in MIBG interpretation scored 38 scans using each method, and the feasibility and utility of the methods were assessed using surveys.
There was good reliability between methods and observers. The user-interface methods required 57 to 110 seconds longer than the visual method. Imaging physicians indicated that it was useful that methods B and C enabled tracking of lesions. Imaging physicians preferred method B to method C because of its efficiency.
We demonstrate the feasibility of semiautomated approaches for Curie score calculation. Although more time was needed for strategies B and C, the ability to track and document individual MIBG-positive lesions over time is a strength of these methods.
放射性碘标记间碘苄胍(MIBG)对神经母细胞瘤的检测具有高度的敏感性和特异性。MIBG 摄取疾病的程度通过居里分数(Curie score)来评估。虽然居里评分在高危神经母细胞瘤患者中具有预后价值,但目前尚无标准化方法来评估随时间推移疾病特定部位的反应。本研究旨在开发居里评分的方法,以方便计算分数和比较连续扫描中特定部位的情况。
我们设计了三种半自动方法来确定居里分数,每种方法的计算机辅助程度都逐渐增加。方法 A 基于视觉评估和 MIBG 摄取病灶的计数。对于方法 B,根据解剖区域与 MIBG 阳性病灶的关联,从图表中计算分数。对于方法 C,使用解剖网格自动标记 MIBG 阳性病灶,并自动分配和计数分数。五位具有 MIBG 解读经验的影像医师使用每种方法对 38 次扫描进行评分,并通过问卷调查评估方法的可行性和实用性。
方法之间和观察者之间具有良好的可靠性。用户界面方法比视觉方法需要多 57 到 110 秒的时间。影像医师表示,方法 B 和 C 能够跟踪病灶,这非常有用。由于效率更高,影像医师更喜欢方法 B 而不是方法 C。
我们证明了半自动居里评分计算方法的可行性。尽管方法 B 和 C 需要更多的时间,但能够随时间跟踪和记录单个 MIBG 阳性病灶是这些方法的优势。