Noble Jason, Gomez Manuel, Fish Joel S
Ross Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite D704, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5.
Burns. 2006 Mar;32(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.08.022. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
To investigate the psychosocial outcomes following electrical burns, a cross-sectional survey of electrical burn patients was done using three outcome tools: the Burn Specific Health Scale brief version (BSHS-B), the Coping with Burns Questionnaire (CBQ), and the Pain Patient Profile (P3). Questionnaires were mailed to electrical burn patients discharged from an adult regional burn centre, and also distributed to attendants of an electrical utility conference in Toronto. Twenty-six of 88 patients who were discharged from the regional burn centre during the study period with updated residential information were contacted and 14 (54%) completed the questionnaires. Twenty questionnaires were also distributed at the conference and 8 (40%) were completed; leaving a total of 22 (48%) patients for the study. The average patient age was 44.0+/-11.7 years; 21 (96%) were men, and the average time from injury to survey completion was 5.3+/-4.9 years. Five (23%) of the 22 patients returned to the same work duties, 10 (45%) changed duties, and 7 (32%) did not return to work. BSHS-B scores were low for all patients. Participants with high voltage burns (>1000 V) had worse sexuality scores (p<0.05), while those with larger burns (>10% TBSA) had worse physical scores (p<0.05). Patients surveyed >5 years from injury showed improvement in physical scores. CBQ scores indicated that optimism was the most commonly used coping strategy. P3 showed significant levels of emotional distress in all patients, with anxiety being more common in high voltage injuries (p<0.05). The data suggests that electrical burn patients may have a limited ability to return to work and an overall poor quality of life. Emotional distress is the dominant feature influencing long-term outcome in these patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.
为了调查电烧伤后的心理社会结局,使用三种结局评估工具对电烧伤患者进行了横断面调查:烧伤特异性健康量表简版(BSHS - B)、烧伤应对问卷(CBQ)和疼痛患者概况(P3)。问卷被邮寄给从成人区域烧伤中心出院的电烧伤患者,同时也分发给多伦多一次电力行业会议的与会者。在研究期间从区域烧伤中心出院且有最新居住信息的88名患者中,联系了26名,其中14名(54%)完成了问卷。在会议上还分发了20份问卷,8份(40%)被完成;最终共有22名(48%)患者参与研究。患者的平均年龄为44.0±11.7岁;21名(96%)为男性,从受伤到完成调查的平均时间为5.3±4.9年。22名患者中有5名(23%)恢复了原工作职责,10名(45%)更换了工作职责,7名(32%)未恢复工作。所有患者的BSHS - B评分都很低。高压烧伤(>1000V)的参与者性功能评分更差(p<0.05),而烧伤面积较大(>10%体表面积)的参与者身体功能评分更差(p<0.05)。受伤超过5年接受调查的患者身体功能评分有所改善。CBQ评分表明乐观是最常用的应对策略。P3显示所有患者都有显著程度的情绪困扰,焦虑在高压损伤患者中更常见(p<0.05)。数据表明电烧伤患者恢复工作的能力可能有限,总体生活质量较差。情绪困扰是影响这些患者长期结局的主要特征。有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现。