Moist Louise M, Muirhead Norm, Wazny Lori D, Gallo Kerri L, Heidenheim A Paul, House Andrew A
University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre--Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Feb;40(2):198-203. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G425. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
The optimal route for administration of exogenous erythropoietin remains controversial, particularly after the increased incidence in pure red cell aplasia. In Canada, the majority of hemodialysis units have converted to the intravenous route for administration of erythropoietin to potentially decrease the risk of pure red cell aplasia.
To compare the difference in the weight-adjusted, weekly erythropoietin dose (units/kg/wk) administered by the subcutaneous compared with the intravenous route in a chronic hemodialysis population followed for 12 months.
This prospective cohort study recruited patients receiving subcutaneous erythropoietin for at least 3 months while undergoing dialysis in a tertiary care hemodialysis program. Participants were switched to intravenous erythropoietin, and the average weekly dose was recorded at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Anemia management and hemoglobin, iron, and delivered dialysis dose targets remained constant throughout the study.
The erythropoietin dose increased by 24.5 units/kg/wk (95% CI 12.7 to 36.3; p < 0.001), representing a 20.2% increase (95% CI 10.5% to 29.9%; p < 0.001) 12 months after conversion from the subcutaneous to intravenous route of administration. Both patients with and without residual renal function at baseline required a significant increase in the intravenous dose.
A 20.2% increase in erythropoietin dose was required to maintain hemoglobin targets between 11 and 12 g/dL after conversion from a subcutaneous to intravenous formulation. Healthcare funding agencies need to reexamine the cost benefit of using intravenous erythropoietin in the hemodialysis population with a low incidence of pure red cell aplasia.
外源性促红细胞生成素的最佳给药途径仍存在争议,尤其是在纯红细胞再生障碍性贫血发病率增加之后。在加拿大,大多数血液透析单位已改为静脉途径给药促红细胞生成素,以潜在降低纯红细胞再生障碍性贫血的风险。
比较在慢性血液透析人群中,皮下注射与静脉注射促红细胞生成素的体重调整每周剂量(单位/千克/周)的差异,随访12个月。
这项前瞻性队列研究招募了在三级医疗血液透析项目中接受皮下促红细胞生成素治疗至少3个月的透析患者。参与者改为静脉注射促红细胞生成素,并在1、2、3、6和12个月记录平均每周剂量。在整个研究过程中,贫血管理以及血红蛋白、铁和透析剂量目标保持不变。
从皮下给药途径转换为静脉给药途径12个月后,促红细胞生成素剂量增加了24.5单位/千克/周(95%可信区间12.7至36.3;p<0.001),即增加了20.2%(95%可信区间10.5%至29.9%;p<0.001)。基线时有无残余肾功能患者的静脉剂量均显著增加。
从皮下制剂转换为静脉制剂后,为使血红蛋白目标维持在11至12g/dL,促红细胞生成素剂量需增加20.2%。医疗保健资助机构需要重新审视在纯红细胞再生障碍性贫血发病率较低的血液透析人群中使用静脉促红细胞生成素的成本效益。