• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析人群中促红细胞生成素从皮下给药转换为静脉给药的情况。

Conversion from subcutaneous to intravenous erythropoietin in a hemodialysis population.

作者信息

Vercaigne Lavern M, Collins David M, Penner S Brian

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;45(8):895-900. doi: 10.1177/0091270005278808.

DOI:10.1177/0091270005278808
PMID:16027399
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare erythropoietin dosage requirements during subcutaneous versus intravenous administration in a hemodialysis population. Hemodialysis patients receiving subcutaneous epoetin alfa were switched to the intravenous route using a prospective, crossover design. Baseline anemia parameters were measured at months -2, -1, and 0 when patients were receiving subcutaneous dosing and compared to months 4, 5, and 6 after the switch to intravenous dosing. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled into the study with an average age of 54.8 years. Over the course of the study, 34 patients were excluded from analysis, leaving 64 patients with complete hemoglobin and erythropoietin dosing data throughout the subcutaneous and intravenous evaluation periods. In these patients, the dose of erythropoietin increased significantly from the subcutaneous to the intravenous period (7567.7 to 10229.2 IU/wk). The conversion of hemodialysis patients from the subcutaneous to the intravenous route of administration significantly increased epoetin alfa dosage requirements.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较血液透析人群皮下注射与静脉注射促红细胞生成素时的剂量需求。接受皮下注射阿法依泊汀的血液透析患者采用前瞻性交叉设计转换为静脉注射途径。在患者接受皮下给药的第-2、-1和0个月测量基线贫血参数,并与转换为静脉给药后的第4、5和6个月进行比较。98名患者纳入研究,平均年龄54.8岁。在研究过程中,34名患者被排除在分析之外,剩下64名患者在整个皮下和静脉评估期有完整的血红蛋白和促红细胞生成素给药数据。在这些患者中,促红细胞生成素的剂量从皮下给药期到静脉给药期显著增加(从7567.7 IU/周增至10229.2 IU/周)。血液透析患者从皮下给药途径转换为静脉给药途径显著增加了阿法依泊汀的剂量需求。

相似文献

1
Conversion from subcutaneous to intravenous erythropoietin in a hemodialysis population.血液透析人群中促红细胞生成素从皮下给药转换为静脉给药的情况。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;45(8):895-900. doi: 10.1177/0091270005278808.
2
Dose of epoetin alfa used in haemodialysis patients when switching from subcutaneous to intravenous administration.血液透析患者从皮下给药转换为静脉给药时促红细胞生成素α的剂量。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2007 Apr;12(2):120-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00761.x.
3
Subcutaneous compared with intravenous epoetin in patients receiving hemodialysis. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Erythropoietin in Hemodialysis Patients.接受血液透析患者皮下注射与静脉注射促红细胞生成素的比较。退伍军人事务部血液透析患者促红细胞生成素合作研究组
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 27;339(9):578-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808273390902.
4
Subcutaneous compared with intravenous epoetin treatment in patients on hemodialysis: one center study.血液透析患者皮下注射与静脉注射促红细胞生成素治疗的比较:一项单中心研究
Ther Apher Dial. 2005 Jun;9(3):233-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1774-9987.2005.00261.x.
5
Erythropoietin dose requirements when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration among patients on hemodialysis.血液透析患者从皮下给药转换为静脉给药时的促红细胞生成素剂量需求。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Feb;40(2):198-203. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G425. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
6
Iron-replete hemodialysis patients do not require higher EPO dosages when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration: results of the Italian Study on Erythropoietin Converting (ISEC).铁储备充足的血液透析患者从皮下给药转换为静脉给药时不需要更高剂量的促红细胞生成素:意大利促红细胞生成素转换研究(ISEC)的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jun;47(6):1027-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.02.176.
7
Haemoglobin response to subcutaneous versus intravenous epoetin alfa administration in iron-replete haemodialysis patients.铁储备充足的血液透析患者皮下注射与静脉注射阿法依泊汀后的血红蛋白反应。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2004 Jun;9(3):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2004.00251.x.
8
Effect of switching from subcutaneous to intravenous administration of epoetin-alpha in haemodialysis patients: results from a Swedish multicentre survey.血液透析患者中促红细胞生成素-α从皮下给药转换为静脉给药的效果:一项瑞典多中心调查的结果
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(4):329-33. doi: 10.1080/00365590510031183.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator: a 19-week, phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-finding study with a 12-month extension phase in patients with chronic renal disease.静脉注射持续促红细胞生成素受体激活剂的疗效和耐受性:一项针对慢性肾病患者的19周、II期、多中心、随机、开放标签、剂量探索性研究,并设有12个月的延长期。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):626-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.014.
10
Erythropoietin-alpha dosage requirements in a provincial hemodialysis population: effect of switching from subcutaneous to intravenous administration.某省血液透析人群中促红细胞生成素α的剂量需求:从皮下注射改为静脉注射的效果
Nephron Clin Pract. 2006;102(3-4):c88-92. doi: 10.1159/000089665. Epub 2005 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Erythropoietin Administration for Anemia Due to Chronic Kidney Disease - Subcutaneous OR Intravenous, What Do We Know So Far?促红细胞生成素治疗慢性肾脏病所致贫血——皮下注射还是静脉注射,目前我们了解多少?
Cureus. 2020 Sep 10;12(9):e10358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10358.
2
Economic Benefits of Switching From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa for the Management of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients.血液透析患者贫血管理中从静脉注射促红细胞生成素α转换为皮下注射促红细胞生成素α的经济效益。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Jun 4;7:2054358120927532. doi: 10.1177/2054358120927532. eCollection 2020.
3
The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection.
关于静脉注射、肌肉注射和皮下注射的药物给药途径的最佳选择。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 2;9:923-42. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87271. eCollection 2015.