公共卫生系统研究：制定国家议程。
Public health systems research: setting a national agenda.
作者信息
Lenaway Dennis, Halverson Paul, Sotnikov Sergey, Tilson Hugh, Corso Liza, Millington Wayne
机构信息
Office of the Chief of Public Health Practice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Mail Stop D-30, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):410-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046037. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine has recommended that policy decisions about improvement of national public health systems be guided by sound scientific evidence. However, to date there is no national research agenda to help guide public health systems. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was called upon to lead a collaborative consensus-based process to define key research questions and establish a framework to create opportunities to better coordinate, leverage, and identify public health resources, which are increasingly scarce. The public health systems research agenda that emerged from this process has 14 over-arching priority research themes. This national agenda should stimulate and guide research to meet the urgent need to improve the nation's public health systems.
摘要
美国医学研究所建议，有关改善国家公共卫生系统的政策决策应以可靠的科学证据为指导。然而，迄今为止，尚无国家研究议程来帮助指导公共卫生系统。美国疾病控制与预防中心被要求牵头开展一个基于共识的协作过程，以确定关键研究问题，并建立一个框架，创造机会更好地协调、利用和识别日益稀缺的公共卫生资源。这一过程产生的公共卫生系统研究议程有14个总体优先研究主题。这一国家议程应刺激并指导研究，以满足改善国家公共卫生系统的迫切需求。
相似文献
1
Public health systems research: setting a national agenda.公共卫生系统研究：制定国家议程。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):410-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046037. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
2
A national research agenda for public health services and systems.国家公共卫生服务和体系研究议程
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5 Suppl 1):S72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.026.
3
New public health services and systems research agenda: directions for the next decade.新的公共卫生服务与系统研究议程：未来十年的方向
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5 Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.027.
4
Marshaling the evidence: the prioritized public health accreditation research agenda.收集证据：优先考虑的公共卫生认证研究议程。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S153-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302247. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Opening a window on systems science research in health promotion and public health.开启一扇通往健康促进与公共卫生领域系统科学研究的窗口。
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(1 Suppl):5S-8S. doi: 10.1177/1090198113503343.
6
European equivalent of US Centers for Disease Control proposed.提议设立与美国疾病控制中心相当的欧洲机构。
Lancet. 2003 Aug 9;362(9382):455. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14103-7.
7
Community-Clinical Linkages Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The Hawai'i Department of Health Perspective.由疾病控制与预防中心支持的社区-临床联系：夏威夷卫生部的观点。
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019 Jun;78(6 Suppl 1):102-103.
8
Evolution of coauthorship in public health services and systems research.公共卫生服务与体系研究合著的演变。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.018.
9
An organizing framework for translation in public health: the Knowledge to Action Framework.公共卫生翻译的组织框架：知识转化框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Mar;8(2):A46. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
引用本文的文献
1
The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.荷兰2021 - 2026年院前急救医疗服务的更新国家研究议程：一项德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 20;29(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6.
2
Developing a national health research agenda for Lao PDR: prioritising the research needs of stakeholders.制定老挝人民民主共和国国家卫生研究议程：确定利益攸关方的研究需求重点。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Jul;13(sup2):1777000. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1777000.
3
Defining and classifying public health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis.定义和分类公共卫生系统：批判性综合解读。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 16;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00583-z.
4
Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program.使用良好实践的九个共同主题清单作为评估省级研究与项目评估计划的研究优先级设定过程的工具。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 23;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0092-5.
5
Creating value: unifying silos into public health business intelligence.创造价值：将孤岛整合为公共卫生商业智能。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 30;2(4):1172. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1172. eCollection 2014.
6
Minimum package of public health services: the adoption of core services in local public health agencies in Colorado.公共卫生服务的最低套餐：科罗拉多州地方公共卫生机构对核心服务的采用。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S252-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302173. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
The value of the "system" in public health services and systems research.“系统”在公共卫生服务与系统研究中的价值。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S147-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302625. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Defining the functions of public health governance.界定公共卫生治理的职能。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S159-66. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302198. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
9
What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom.自闭症研究应关注什么？来自英国的社区观点和优先事项。
Autism. 2014 Oct;18(7):756-70. doi: 10.1177/1362361314529627. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Thinking beyond the silos: emerging priorities in workforce development for state and local government public health agencies.突破局限思考：州和地方政府公共卫生机构劳动力发展的新重点
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):557-65. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000076.
本文引用的文献
1
Local public health agency capacity and its relationship to public health system performance.地方公共卫生机构的能力及其与公共卫生系统绩效的关系。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 May-Jun;10(3):204-15. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200405000-00004.
2
A research agenda for public health workforce development.公共卫生人力发展研究议程。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 May-Jun;10(3):186-92. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200405000-00002.
3
The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda.社区设计与土地利用选择对公众健康的影响：一项科研议程。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1500-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1500.
4
Behind the curve? What we know and need to learn from public health systems research.落后于形势？我们从公共卫生系统研究中了解到的以及需要学习的内容。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):179-82. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200305000-00001.
5
The structure of state health agencies: a strategic analysis.国家卫生机构的结构：一项战略分析。
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Mar;60(1):31-57. doi: 10.1177/1077558702250231.
6
Making the most of collaboration: exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning.充分利用合作：探索伙伴关系协同效应与伙伴关系运作之间的关系。
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):683-98. doi: 10.1177/109019802237938.
7
Strengthening the nation's public health infrastructure: historic challenge, unprecedented opportunity.加强国家公共卫生基础设施：历史性挑战，前所未有的机遇。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):15-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.15.
8
Behavioral health: setting the rural health research agenda.行为健康：设定农村卫生研究议程。
J Rural Health. 2002;18 Suppl:242-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00934.x.
9
Embracing the strength of the public health system: why strong government public health agencies are vitally necessary but insufficient.拥抱公共卫生系统的力量：为何强大的政府公共卫生机构至关重要但却不够。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002 Jan;8(1):98-100. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200201000-00019.
10
Working together? Organizational and market determinants of collaboration between public health and medical care providers.携手合作？公共卫生与医疗服务提供者合作的组织及市场决定因素。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Dec;90(12):1913-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1913.
Zotero 插件