Morse Janice M
International Institute for Qualitative Methodology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):415-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285488.
As qualitative researchers, we have not explored our own work from the qualitative evidence perspective. The author suggests that qualitative researchers need to explore the conflicting agendas of evidence-based medicine and qualitative inquiry, compare the anatomy of qualitative data and evidenced-based data, and explore the autonomy of qualitative inquiry within the context of evidenced-based medicine. By attending to and communicating the differences in qualitative and quantitative evidence, and by accepting the differences in our research agendas, qualitative researchers will achieve the legitimacy that they deserve and which they require.
作为定性研究人员，我们尚未从定性证据的角度审视我们自己的工作。作者认为，定性研究人员需要探讨循证医学与定性探究之间相互冲突的议程，比较定性数据与循证数据的剖析，并在循证医学的背景下探究定性探究的自主性。通过关注并传达定性和定量证据的差异，以及接受我们研究议程中的差异，定性研究人员将获得他们应得且所需的合法性。
