Jennings Bonnie Mowinski, Yeager Katherine A
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, 1520 Clifton Road, NE, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Jan 21;8:100298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100298. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The term saturation is used ubiquitously in reports of qualitative research. The term is often used, however, as a throw-away line, sans definition, rationale, or explanation of the process. Consequently, there remains a question about what is meant when saturation is used. The concept of saturation originated in grounded theory. Achieving theoretical saturation is one of the tenets of grounded theory. Over time, this specific and singular term has migrated to a general term that reflects various types of saturation such as code, data, theme, and meaning saturation. There is a lack of clarity among saturation types and a lack of transparency in reporting what is meant by saturation and how it was achieved. There is also a question about the relevance of saturation to qualitative methodologies outside grounded theory. In seeking to raise awareness of the issues surrounding the term saturation, in this discussion paper we offer a synopsis of the history and evolution of the term saturation, address the current conundrum about saturation in qualitative research, and examine the use of saturation in qualitative articles published in the six nursing journals with the highest journal impact factors. This re-view reflects the need to critically assess the status of saturation as it is used in nursing journals. Better definitions of terms are needed to assure consistency in language that will enhance understanding for the end user of qualitative research reports. Those conducting and assessing qualitative inquiries need clear understanding of what is appropriate for each qualitative methodology-saturation does not apply to some qualitative approaches. Mentorship and teaching are at the heart of the saturation issue. Finding a mentor who is a solid methodologist may require nurses to reach out to individuals in other disciplines such as sociology, psychology, or anthropology. In the absence of a mentor, investigators conducting qualitative inquiry are urged to become well-versed in the methodology they believe is best suited to their question by turning to original sources written by well-trained methodologists. It is imperative that students who may become educators or researchers who then become reviewers and perhaps journal editors have a solid understanding of key qualitative concepts such as saturation.
饱和度这个术语在定性研究报告中被广泛使用。然而,这个术语常常被当作一句随口说出的话,没有定义、原理或对该过程的解释。因此,当使用饱和度时其含义究竟是什么仍然是个问题。饱和度的概念起源于扎根理论。实现理论饱和度是扎根理论的宗旨之一。随着时间的推移,这个特定且单一的术语已演变成一个通用术语,反映了各种类型的饱和度,如编码饱和度、数据饱和度、主题饱和度和意义饱和度。饱和度类型之间缺乏清晰度,在报告饱和度的含义以及如何实现饱和度方面也缺乏透明度。饱和度与扎根理论之外的定性研究方法的相关性也存在问题。为了提高对围绕饱和度这一术语的问题的认识,在本讨论文件中,我们概述了饱和度这一术语的历史和演变,探讨了定性研究中当前关于饱和度的难题,并研究了在六种具有最高期刊影响因子的护理期刊上发表的定性文章中饱和度的使用情况。这一综述反映了批判性评估护理期刊中使用的饱和度现状的必要性。需要更好的术语定义来确保语言的一致性,这将增进定性研究报告最终用户的理解。进行和评估定性研究的人员需要清楚了解每种定性方法适合什么——饱和度并不适用于某些定性方法。指导和教学是饱和度问题的核心。找到一位优秀的方法学家作为导师可能要求护士向社会学、心理学或人类学等其他学科的人员寻求帮助。在没有导师的情况下,进行定性研究的调查人员被敦促通过查阅训练有素的方法学家撰写的原始资料,精通他们认为最适合其研究问题的方法。至关重要的是,那些可能成为教育工作者或研究人员,进而成为审稿人甚至期刊编辑的学生,要对饱和度等关键定性概念有扎实的理解。