• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.

作者信息

Brautaset Rune L, Jennings J Adrian M

机构信息

Binocular Research Lab., Unit of Optometry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2006 Feb;12(2):MT1-4. Epub 2006 Jan 26.

PMID:16449958
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fixation disparity is the condition in which the images of a binocularly fixated object are not imaged on exactly corresponding retinal points, but are still within Panum's fusional areas. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity have indicated that subjective fixation disparity does not indicate the true eye position. However, the effect of the foveal fusional lock (FFL) on the relationship between objective and subjective fixation disparity is still not clear.

MATERIAL/METHODS: This relationship was investigated in five subjects. The objective measurements were made using scleral search coils, and at the same time the Sheedy distance disparometer indicated the subjective fixation disparity. Measurements were obtained both with and without an FFL.

RESULTS

It was found that without an FFL there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between subjective and objective fixation disparity, whereas when an FFL was added, the difference was no longer significant. Additionally, the absolute sizes of both SFD and OFD were found to be significantly smaller with the FFL.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the presence of an FFL makes subjective fixation disparity a more accurate indicator of the objective eye position. An instrument with an FFL should therefore be used clinically. The difference between objective and subjective fixation disparity presumably indicates a change in correspondence.

摘要

相似文献

1
Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Feb;12(2):MT1-4. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
2
[Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions].[使用Pola注视点测试的注视差异:在自然观察条件下不能代表眼位]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Apr;212(4):226-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034869.
3
The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.光照及中央凹融合锁定对使用希迪视差仪进行临床注视视差测量的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1985;5(2):171-8.
4
Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.暗集合的客观测量与主观测量
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Jan;27(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00448.x.
5
Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.使用希迪视差仪和韦森注视视差卡测量的注视视差曲线变量的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Aug;72(8):580-8.
6
The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.马利特注视差异试验:测试说明的影响及其与症状的关系
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Sep;26(5):507-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00385.x.
7
Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.用萨拉丁卡片和视差仪测量的注视差异比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jun;88(6):E733-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318214ba6e.
8
Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods.注视差异的客观测量与主观测量在短时间和长时间注视期间的比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Jul;30(4):379-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00753.x.
9
Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.用于测量注视差异及相关隐斜的市售设备比较。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1988 Jun;59(6):451-60.
10
Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.使用韦森注视差异卡片和希迪视差仪获得的注视差异测量结果的比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 1993 May;70(5):414-20. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199305000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
The preferred retinal loci when the eyes converge.眼睛会聚时的首选视网膜部位。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.15.
2
Effects of aligning prisms on the objective and subjective fixation disparity in far distance.远距离时,调整棱镜对客观和主观注视差异的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Dec 11;12(4). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.4.8.
3
Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?iPad注视差异测试的结果与马利特近用注视差异测试的结果是否等同?
J Optom. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
4
Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.个体客观与主观固视差异作为强制聚散的函数。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199958. eCollection 2018.
5
Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.棱镜眼镜对客观和主观注视差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0138871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138871. eCollection 2015.