Cobban Sandra J
Dental Hygiene Program, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2004 Nov;2(4):152-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2004.00095.x.
The application of knowledge is fundamental to human problem solving. In health disciplines, knowledge utilization commonly manifests through evidence-based decision making in practice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of the evidence-based practice (EBP) movement in health professions in general, and dental hygiene in particular, and to examine its relationship to the professionalization agenda of dental hygiene in Canada. EBP means integrating practitioner expertise with the best available external evidence from research. Proponents of EBP believe that it holds promise for reducing a research-practice gap by encouraging clinicians to seek current research results. Both the Canadian and American Dental Hygienists Associations support practice based on current research evidence, yet recent studies show variation in practice. Professionalization refers to the developmental stages through which an organized occupation passes as it develops traits that characterize it as a profession. The status conferred by professionalization privileges a group to make and monitor its own decisions relative to practice. Dental hygiene's success in acquiring attributes of a profession suggests that transformation to a profession is occurring. This paper compares the assumptions and challenges of both movements, and argues the need for a principal focus on the development of a culture of evidence-based dental hygiene practice.
知识的应用是人类解决问题的基础。在健康学科中,知识的利用通常通过实践中的循证决策得以体现。本文旨在探讨循证实践(EBP)运动在一般健康职业,尤其是口腔卫生领域的发展,并审视其与加拿大口腔卫生职业化议程的关系。循证实践意味着将从业者的专业知识与研究中可得的最佳外部证据相结合。循证实践的支持者认为,通过鼓励临床医生寻求当前的研究结果,它有望缩小研究与实践之间的差距。加拿大和美国的口腔卫生师协会均支持基于当前研究证据的实践,但近期研究显示实践存在差异。职业化指的是一个有组织的职业在发展过程中经历的各个阶段,在此过程中它逐渐形成使其成为一门专业的特质。职业化赋予的地位使一个群体有权就实践做出并监督自身决策。口腔卫生在获得专业属性方面的成功表明其正朝着专业方向转变。本文比较了这两种运动的假设和挑战,并论证了主要关注循证口腔卫生实践文化发展的必要性。