Esposito Thomas J, Leon Luis, Jurkovich Gregory J
Division of Trauma, Burns and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Loyola Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197425.87092.d5.
This study seeks to characterize the opinions of practicing surgeons as a basis for formulating a plan to restructure the discipline of trauma surgery and its training path.
A 52-item questionnaire was administered to the membership of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, and the Western Trauma Association. The survey tool investigated issues related to current and future practice.
Response rate was 60%. Mean age was 49 years and 88% were male. The average time in practice is 15 years. The average workweek is 80 hours with 48% of that time devoted to clinical practice. About half take in-house call and about one-third receive an on-call stipend. The median annual number of major trauma cases was 50. The most important disincentives to entering the field were felt to be lifestyle issues and a limited scope of practice. Almost 90% felt their work as trauma surgeons was undervalued by society and the health care system. The great majority (88%) responded that the discipline of trauma surgery must change. Respondents feel this restructuring should include broader general surgery (83%) as well as limited orthopedic (60%) and neurosurgical trauma-related procedures (59%). About one-half of respondents favored in-house call (54%) and a practice model similar to emergency medicine (55%). Factors that would most enhance practice were thought to be guaranteed appropriate salary and guaranteed time away from work. Training in a broad range of skills was felt to be essential or useful to the trauma surgeon of the future, although few currently employ such a wide breadth of skills.
Current practicing trauma surgeons feel that the discipline must change to remain viable. This change should entail broader training to allow more procedures in trauma, emergency surgery, critical care, and elective general surgery. The preferred practice model is a large, hospital-based, diversified group practice with a predictable lifestyle and guaranteed salary commensurate with effort. Inclusion of selected emergency orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures are viewed favorably, as is in-house call. Efforts to increase public perception of trauma surgery's value to society and its impending demise are warranted.
本研究旨在了解执业外科医生的意见,为制定创伤外科学科及其培训路径的重组计划提供依据。
向美国创伤外科学会、东部创伤外科学会和西部创伤外科学会的会员发放了一份包含52个条目的问卷。该调查工具调查了与当前和未来实践相关的问题。
回复率为60%。平均年龄为49岁,88%为男性。平均执业时间为15年。平均每周工作80小时,其中48%的时间用于临床实践。约一半的人承担院内值班,约三分之一的人获得值班津贴。每年重大创伤病例的中位数为50例。人们认为进入该领域最重要的阻碍因素是生活方式问题和执业范围有限。近90%的人认为他们作为创伤外科医生的工作被社会和医疗保健系统低估。绝大多数(88%)受访者表示创伤外科学科必须改变。受访者认为这种重组应包括更广泛的普通外科(83%)以及有限的骨科(60%)和神经外科创伤相关手术(59%)。约一半的受访者赞成院内值班(54%)和类似于急诊医学的执业模式(55%)。人们认为最能改善执业状况的因素是有保障的适当薪资和有保障的休假时间。尽管目前很少有人具备如此广泛的技能,但广泛的技能培训被认为对未来的创伤外科医生至关重要或有用。
目前的执业创伤外科医生认为该学科必须改变以保持活力。这种改变应包括更广泛的培训,以便在创伤、急诊手术、重症监护和择期普通外科方面能够开展更多手术。首选的执业模式是大型的、以医院为基础的、多元化的团体执业,生活方式可预测,薪资与付出相匹配且有保障。纳入选定的急诊骨科和神经外科手术以及院内值班受到好评。有必要努力提高公众对创伤外科对社会价值及其即将消亡的认识。