Suppr超能文献

创伤专科培训:业内人士的观点。

Trauma fellowship training: the insiders' perspective.

作者信息

Knuth T E

机构信息

Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Baltimore 21201-1595.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Aug;35(2):233-40.

PMID:8355301
Abstract

Trauma care is in a period of transition from care given by surgeons at the closest community hospital to care given by trauma specialists at trauma centers and within emergency medical systems. It has thus become increasingly important for the educational goals of trauma fellowship training to reflect the needs of the future system as well as the views of future practitioners. These views differ from those of surgical colleagues practicing trauma surgery, and the views of future trauma specialists should be considered during the formulation of training guidelines. This survey appears to be the first attempt to interpret the views of trauma fellows: 48 of the 83 fellows (57.8%) in the 1991-1992 national cohort responded. They made suggestions about their own training, including ways to increase surgical experiences and opportunities for academic pursuits, but gave no insight as to an appropriate mix of critical care training. Although critical care certification is a major attraction for fellowship training, the cohort does not want to be thought of as nonoperating surgical intensivists. A second year of fellowship training is seen as necessary for research and trauma systems-related studies.

摘要

创伤护理正处于一个转型期,从由距离最近的社区医院的外科医生提供护理,转变为由创伤中心和紧急医疗系统内的创伤专科医生提供护理。因此,创伤专科培训的教育目标反映未来系统的需求以及未来从业者的观点变得越来越重要。这些观点与从事创伤外科手术的外科同事的观点不同,在制定培训指南时应考虑未来创伤专科医生的观点。这项调查似乎是首次尝试解读创伤专科住院医生的观点:1991 - 1992年全国队列中的83名专科住院医生中有48名(57.8%)做出了回应。他们对自己的培训提出了建议,包括增加手术经验和学术追求机会的方法,但对于重症护理培训的适当组合没有给出见解。尽管重症护理认证是专科培训的一个主要吸引力,但该队列不想被视为非手术的外科重症监护医生。专科培训的第二年被认为对于研究和与创伤系统相关的研究是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验