• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中心针对酒精紊乱的简短干预措施可减少后续因酒驾被捕的情况。

Trauma center brief interventions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests.

作者信息

Schermer Carol R, Moyers Theresa B, Miller William R, Bloomfield Lori A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000199420.12322.5d.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000199420.12322.5d
PMID:16456433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of trauma center admissions are related to driving under the influence (DUI); however, there has been no prior report of brief intervention (BI) after injury reducing subsequent DUI arrests. The hypothesis of this study was that injured patients receiving BI would have a lower risk of DUI arrest within 3 years of discharge than those receiving standard care (SC).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized clinical trial randomly allocated patients involved in motor vehicle collisions to receive SC or a BI regarding alcohol use. The primary outcome measure was DUI arrest within 3 years of hospital discharge. DUI arrests were documented by matching demographic information to state traffic safety data.

RESULTS

After randomization (N = 126), BI and SC groups were similar in age, prior DUI arrests, and alcohol screening score. BI sessions lasted an average of 30 minutes and were performed by either a social worker or a trauma surgeon. Approximately one in six participants (n = 21, 16.7%) had a DUI arrest within 3 years of hospital discharge. Within 3 years of hospital discharge, 14 of 64 patients (21.9%) in the SC group had an arrest for DUI compared with only 7 of 62 patients (11.3%) who received the BI. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that BI was the strongest protective factor against DUI arrest (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval < or =CI], 0.11-0.96). Prior number of DUIs (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01) and age (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99) were also associated with DUI arrest post-hospitalization, but alcohol screening score (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.13) was not. The absolute risk reduction implies that only nine patients would need to receive a BI to prevent one DUI arrest.

CONCLUSION

Patients who receive BI during a trauma center admission are less likely to be arrested for DUI within 3 years of discharge. BI represents a viable intervention to reduce DUI after trauma center admission.

摘要

背景

大量创伤中心收治的患者与酒后驾车(DUI)有关;然而,此前尚无关于受伤后进行简短干预(BI)可减少后续DUI被捕的报告。本研究的假设是,与接受标准护理(SC)的患者相比,接受BI的受伤患者出院后3年内DUI被捕的风险更低。

方法

这项前瞻性随机临床试验将机动车碰撞事故患者随机分配接受SC或关于饮酒的BI。主要结局指标是出院后3年内DUI被捕情况。通过将人口统计学信息与州交通安全数据匹配来记录DUI被捕情况。

结果

随机分组后(N = 126),BI组和SC组在年龄、既往DUI被捕情况和酒精筛查评分方面相似。BI疗程平均持续30分钟,由社会工作者或创伤外科医生进行。约六分之一的参与者(n = 21,16.7%)在出院后3年内有DUI被捕记录。出院后3年内,SC组64例患者中有14例(21.9%)因DUI被捕,而接受BI的62例患者中只有7例(11.3%)。多变量分析表明,BI是预防DUI被捕的最强保护因素(优势比[OR],0.32;95%置信区间[CI],0.11 - 0.96)。既往DUI次数(OR,1.43;95% CI,1.03 - 2.01)和年龄(OR,0.94;95% CI,0.88 - 0.99)也与出院后DUI被捕有关,但酒精筛查评分(OR,1.06;95% CI,0.99 - 1.13)无关。绝对风险降低意味着仅需9例患者接受BI即可预防1例DUI被捕。

结论

在创伤中心住院期间接受BI的患者出院后3年内因DUI被捕的可能性较小。BI是创伤中心住院后减少DUI的一种可行干预措施。

相似文献

1
Trauma center brief interventions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests.创伤中心针对酒精紊乱的简短干预措施可减少后续因酒驾被捕的情况。
J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000199420.12322.5d.
2
Legal prosecution of alcohol-impaired drivers admitted to a level I trauma center in Rhode Island.对入住罗德岛一级创伤中心的酒后驾车司机的法律起诉。
J Trauma. 2004 Jan;56(1):24-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000108632.51898.DB.
3
The effect on problematic drinking behavior of a brief motivational interview shortly after a first arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol: a randomized trial.酒精影响下首次被捕后不久进行简短动机性访谈对问题饮酒行为的影响:一项随机试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):661-70; discussion 670-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000144.
4
Alcohol interventions for trauma patients are not just for adults: justification for brief interventions for the injured adolescent at a pediatric trauma center.针对创伤患者的酒精干预措施并非仅适用于成年人:儿科创伤中心对受伤青少年进行简短干预的理由。
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):202-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181df646a.
5
The implications of alcohol intoxication and the Uniform Policy Provision Law on trauma centers; a national trauma data bank analysis of minimally injured patients.酒精中毒及《统一政策条款法》对创伤中心的影响;一项关于轻伤患者的国家创伤数据库分析
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):495-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818234bf.
6
An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California.对加利福尼亚州酒精治疗、驾照措施和监禁刑期在减少酒后驾车累犯方面有效性的评估。
Addiction. 1997 Aug;92(8):989-97.
7
300 all-terrain vehicle crashes: an East Tennessee trauma center's experience.300起全地形车事故:东田纳西州一家创伤中心的经验
Tenn Med. 2009 Aug;102(8):45-7.
8
Too young to drink but old enough to drive under the influence: a study of underage offenders as seen in substance abuse treatment in Texas.年龄太小不能饮酒,但却到了可以在受影响的情况下开车的年纪:对德克萨斯州药物滥用治疗中所见的未成年罪犯的一项研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Sep 1;104(1-2):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 27.
9
A controlled trial of brief intervention versus brief advice for at-risk drinking trauma center patients.针对创伤中心有饮酒风险患者的简短干预与简短建议的对照试验。
J Trauma. 2007 May;62(5):1102-11; discussion 1111-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804bdb26.
10
Screening and intervention for alcohol problems among patients admitted following unintentional injury: a missed opportunity?对因意外伤害入院患者的酒精问题进行筛查与干预:一个被错失的机会?
N Z Med J. 2007 Feb 16;120(1249):U2417.

引用本文的文献

1
Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.利用移动技术影响对酒后驾驶风险的认知和决策。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Feb;38(1):47-55. doi: 10.1037/adb0000929. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Alcohol use disorder in the intensive care unit a highly morbid condition, but chemical dependency discussion improves outcomes.重症监护病房中的酒精使用障碍是一种高发病症,但关于化学物质依赖的讨论可改善治疗结果。
Acute Crit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):122-133. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00584. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Mind The Gap: Differences in Alcohol Use Screening And Discussions Among Adults Comparing Asian American And Other Racial And Ethnic Subgroups in the United States, 2015-2019.
注意差距:2015 年至 2019 年期间,美国的亚裔美国人和其他种族和族裔群体在酒精使用筛查和讨论方面存在差异。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2023 Jan 9;58(1):31-39. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agac050.
4
A randomized pilot trial of a mobile phone-based brief intervention with personalized feedback and interactive text messaging to reduce driving after cannabis use and riding with a cannabis impaired driver.一项基于手机的简短干预措施的随机试点试验,该措施提供个性化反馈和互动短信,以减少大麻使用后的驾驶行为和与大麻影响的司机一起乘车。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Nov;142:108867. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108867. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
5
Culturally adapted evidence-based treatments for adults with substance use problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.针对有物质使用问题的成年人的文化适应性循证治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Sep 1;226:108856. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108856. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Risk factors associated with driving under the influence of drugs in the USA.与美国吸毒后驾驶相关的风险因素。
Inj Prev. 2021 Dec;27(6):514-520. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044015. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
The Effects of a Brief Motivational Intervention for Alcohol Use through Stages of Change among Nontreatment Seeking Injured Patients.非治疗寻求的受伤患者在改变阶段接受简短动机干预对酒精使用的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Nov;44(11):2361-2372. doi: 10.1111/acer.14466. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
Protective behavioral strategies predict alcohol-related problems among injured patients following a brief intervention.保护性行为策略可预测接受简短干预后受伤患者的酒精相关问题。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107535. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Trends and correlates of driving under the influence of alcohol among different types of adult substance users in the United States: a national survey study.美国不同类型成年物质使用者中酒后驾车的趋势和相关因素:一项全国性调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 4;19(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6889-8.
10
A Mobile Phone-Based Brief Intervention With Personalized Feedback and Text Messaging Is Associated With Reductions in Driving After Drinking Among College Drinkers.基于手机的简短干预措施,结合个性化反馈和短信,与减少大学生酒后驾车行为有关。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Sep;79(5):710-719. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.710.