Shi Shuo, Liu Jie, Li Jun, Zheng Kang-Cheng, Huang Xiao-Mei, Tan Cai-Ping, Chen Lan-Mei, Ji Liang-Nian
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, PR China.
J Inorg Biochem. 2006 Mar;100(3):385-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
Novel chiral Ru(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)2L]2+ (bpy = 2,2-bipyridine; L: o-mopip = 2-(2-methoxylphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, p-mopip = 2-(4-methoxylphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) containing -OCH3 at different positions on the phenyl ring have been synthesized and characterized. The DNA-binding and DNA-photocleavage properties of the complexes were investigated. The theoretical calculations for these complexes were also carried out applying the density functional theory (DFT) method. The experimental results show that: both these two isomer complexes can bind to DNA in an intercalative mode; the DNA-binding affinity of [Ru(bpy)2(p-mopip)] 2 is greater than that of [Ru(bpy)2(o-mopip)] 1; moreover, the DNA-binding affinities of enantiomers delta-1 and delta-2 are all greater than those of lambda-1 and lambda-2, respectively. In addition, a very interesting finding is experimentally obtained, i.e. under a low [DNA]/[Ru] ratio, the emission intensities of delta-1 and lambda-1 are all weaker than those of delta-2 and lambda-2, however, upon a high [DNA]/[Ru] ratio, the emission intensities of both delta-1 and lambda-1 are stronger than those of delta-2 and lambda-2. Such a difference of the emission spectra can be interpreted by the electric effect of substituent on the intercalative ligand. The difference in DNA-binding affinities of these two isomeric complexes can also be reasonably explained by the DFT calculations.
已合成并表征了新型手性钌(II)配合物[Ru(bpy)2L]2+(bpy = 2,2-联吡啶;L:o-mopip = 2-(2-甲氧基苯基)咪唑并[4,5-f][1,10]菲咯啉,p-mopip = 2-(4-甲氧基苯基)咪唑并[4,5-f][1,10]菲咯啉),其苯环上不同位置含有-OCH3。研究了该配合物的DNA结合和DNA光裂解性质。还应用密度泛函理论(DFT)方法对这些配合物进行了理论计算。实验结果表明:这两种异构体配合物均能以插入模式与DNA结合;[Ru(bpy)2(p-mopip)] 2对DNA的结合亲和力大于[Ru(bpy)2(o-mopip)] 1;此外,对映体delta-1和delta-2对DNA的结合亲和力分别均大于lambda-1和lambda-2。另外,实验还得到了一个非常有趣的发现,即在低[DNA]/[Ru]比值下,delta-1和lambda-1的发射强度均弱于delta-2和lambda-2,然而,在高[DNA]/[Ru]比值下,delta-1和lambda-1的发射强度均强于delta-2和lambda-2。这种发射光谱的差异可以通过插入配体上取代基的电子效应来解释。这两种异构体配合物在DNA结合亲和力上的差异也可以通过DFT计算得到合理的解释。