Suppr超能文献

重新审视约翰·斯诺的伦敦南部研究:贝叶斯评估与重新计算

Rethinking John Snow's South London study: a Bayesian evaluation and recalculation.

作者信息

Koch Thomas, Denike Kenneth

机构信息

University British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6K 2S1.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(1):271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

Abstract

Famously, John Snow attempted to convince a critical professional audience that public water supplied to South London residents by private companies was a principal vector for the transmission of cholera. The result has been called the sine qua non of the "epidemiological imagination," a landmark study still taught today. In fact, Snow twice attempted to prove public water supplies spread cholera to the South London population. His first, published in 1855, suffered from an incomplete data set that limited its descriptive and predictive import. In 1856, armed with new data, Snow published a more definitive study. This paper describes a previously unacknowledged methodological and conceptual problem in Snow's 1856 argument. We review the context of the South London study, identify the problem and then correct it with an empirical Bayes estimation (EBE) approach. The result hopefully revitalizes Snow's research as a teaching case through the application of a contemporary statistical approach.

摘要

著名的是,约翰·斯诺试图说服一群关键的专业人士,让他们相信由私人公司向伦敦南部居民供应的公共用水是霍乱传播的主要媒介。其结果被称为“流行病学想象力”的必要条件,这是一项至今仍在教授的具有里程碑意义的研究。事实上,斯诺曾两次试图证明公共供水将霍乱传播给了伦敦南部的居民。他的第一次尝试发表于1855年,其数据集不完整,限制了其描述性和预测性的重要意义。1856年,斯诺凭借新的数据发表了一项更具权威性的研究。本文描述了斯诺1856年论证中一个此前未被认识到的方法和概念问题。我们回顾了伦敦南部研究的背景,识别出问题,然后用经验贝叶斯估计(EBE)方法进行修正。希望通过应用当代统计方法,这一结果能使斯诺的研究作为一个教学案例重焕生机。

相似文献

1
Rethinking John Snow's South London study: a Bayesian evaluation and recalculation.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(1):271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
2
Principles of reasoning in historical epidemiology.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):968-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01902.x.
3
A rivalry of foulness: official and unofficial investigations of the London cholera epidemic of 1854.
Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1545-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1545.
4
Crediting his critics' concerns: remaking John Snow's map of Broad Street cholera, 1854.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(8):1246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.046. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
5
Re-evaluating John Snow's 1856 south London study.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;344:116612. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116612. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
6
The mortality rates and the space-time patterns of John Snow's cholera epidemic map.
Int J Health Geogr. 2015 Jun 17;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12942-015-0011-y.
9
The changing assessments of John Snow's and William Farr's cholera studies.
Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46(4):225-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01593177.
10
Who made John Snow a hero?
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 May 15;133(10):967-73. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115816.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: nobody loves a critic: Edmund A Parkes and John Snow's cholera.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1553-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt194.
2
Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.
Reprod Toxicol. 2013 Jul;38:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
John Snow, hero of cholera: RIP.
CMAJ. 2008 Jun 17;178(13):1736. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080805.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验