Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):968-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01902.x.
The case of John Snow has long been important to epidemiologists and public health officials. However, despite the fact that there have been many discussions about the various aspects of Snow's case, there has been virtually no discussion about what guided Snow's reasoning in his coming to believe his various conclusions about cholera. Here, I want to take up this question in some detail and show that there are a number of specific principles of reasoning that played a crucial role for Snow. Moreover, these principles were epistemologically important to Snow, a fact about which Snow is explicit in many places. An analysis of Snow's case suggests that, because of the epistemic role such principles of reasoning can play, health care practitioners ought to understand their practices to be theoretically informed in these ways, and not just data driven.
约翰·斯诺的案例长期以来一直对流行病学家和公共卫生官员很重要。然而,尽管已经有很多关于斯诺案例的各个方面的讨论,但实际上几乎没有讨论是什么指导斯诺得出他对霍乱的各种结论的推理。在这里,我想详细探讨这个问题,并表明有一些具体的推理原则对斯诺起到了至关重要的作用。此外,这些原则对斯诺来说在认识论上很重要,这一点在他的许多地方都有明确说明。对斯诺案例的分析表明,由于这些推理原则可以在认识论上发挥作用,医疗保健从业者应该理解他们的实践是以这些方式进行理论指导的,而不仅仅是数据驱动的。