Pepine Carl J, Kowey Peter R, Kupfer Stuart, Kolloch Rainer E, Benetos Athanase, Mancia Giuseppe, Coca Antonio, Cooper-DeHoff Rhonda M, Handberg Eileen, Gaxiola Efrain, Sleight Peter, Conti C Richard, Hewkin Ann C, Tavazzi Luigi
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0277, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.031. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
We sought to determine predictors for adverse outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Factors leading to adverse outcomes in hypertensive patients with CAD are poorly understood. The INternational VErapamil-trandolapril STudy (INVEST) compared outcomes in hypertensive patients with CAD that were assigned randomly to either a verapamil sustained-release (SR)- or an atenolol-based strategy for blood pressure (BP) control. Trandolapril and hydrochlorothiazide were used as added agents. During follow-up (61,835 patient-years), BP control and the primary outcome (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) were not different between strategies.
We investigated risk for adverse outcome associated with baseline factors, follow-up BP, and drug treatments using Cox modeling.
Previous heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.96), as well as diabetes (HR 1.77), increased age (HR 1.63), U.S. residency (HR 1.61), renal impairment (HR 1.50), stroke/transient ischemic attack (HR 1.43), smoking (HR 1.41), myocardial infarction (HR 1.34), peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.27), and revascularization (HR 1.15) predicted increased risk. Follow-up systolic BP <140 mm Hg or diastolic BP <90 mm Hg (HRs 0.82 or 0.70, respectively) and trandolapril with verapamil SR (HRs 0.78 and 0.79) were associated with reduced risk.
In hypertensive patients with CAD, increased risk for adverse outcomes was associated with conditions related to the severity of CAD and diminished left ventricular function. Lower follow-up BP and addition of trandolapril to verapamil SR each were associated with reduced risk.
我们试图确定冠心病(CAD)高血压患者不良结局的预测因素。
导致CAD高血压患者不良结局的因素尚不清楚。国际维拉帕米 - 群多普利研究(INVEST)比较了CAD高血压患者随机分配至维拉帕米缓释(SR)或阿替洛尔为基础的血压(BP)控制策略后的结局。群多普利和氢氯噻嗪用作附加药物。在随访期间(61,835患者 - 年),两种策略之间的血压控制和主要结局(死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中)无差异。
我们使用Cox模型研究与基线因素、随访血压和药物治疗相关的不良结局风险。
既往心力衰竭(校正风险比[HR] 1.96)、糖尿病(HR 1.77)、年龄增加(HR 1.63)、美国居住(HR 1.61)、肾功能损害(HR 1.50)、卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作(HR 1.43)、吸烟(HR 1.41)、心肌梗死(HR 1.34)、外周血管疾病(HR 1.27)和血运重建(HR 1.15)预测风险增加。随访收缩压<140 mmHg或舒张压<90 mmHg(HR分别为0.82或0.70)以及群多普利与维拉帕米SR联合使用(HR分别为0.78和0.79)与风险降低相关。
在CAD高血压患者中,不良结局风险增加与CAD严重程度相关的情况及左心室功能减退有关。较低的随访血压以及在维拉帕米SR中添加群多普利均与风险降低相关。