• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医务人员对心脏骤停后预后的认识和看法。

The knowledge and perceptions of medical personnel relating to outcome after cardiac arrest.

作者信息

Jones Kerin, Garg Manish, Bali Doru, Yang Roger, Compton Scott

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine, UHC-6G, Detroit, MI 48201-2153, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.023. Epub 2006 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.023
PMID:16458410
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the knowledge of probable outcome by medical personnel for in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, and self-reported history of CPR training referrals for family members of cardiac patients.

METHODS

One hundred people from each of three population lists were randomly selected at a large, urban school of medicine and affiliated medical center: (1) year III and IV medical students; (2) residents in family medicine, emergency medicine, internal medicine, anesthesia, and surgery; (3) attending physicians in the same departments. A questionnaire was distributed that elicited estimates of in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA and OHCA, respectively) survival rates, and CPR training referral history. Estimates were compared against published data for accuracy (IHCA: 5-20%; OHCA 1-10%)

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 63%. Accurate in-hospital cardiac arrest estimates [% (95% CI)] of survival were provided by 51.1% (36.8-63.4%), 47.3% (35.9-58.7%), and 36.7% (23.2-50.2%) of students, residents, and attending physicians, respectively. Accurate out-of-hospital estimates of survival were provided by 51.1% (36.8-63.4%), 52.1% (40.6-63.5%), and 70.8% (57.9-83.7%), respectively. Most thought that family members of cardiac patients ought to be CPR trained (92.6%). However, few had referred any for training in the past year (16.5%). There was strong support across respondent groups for including death notification information in the ACLS training program, with 80.4% of all respondents in favor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that medical experience is not associated with accurate estimates of cardiac arrest survival. Overwhelmingly, medical personnel believe family members should be trained to perform CPR, however, few refer family members for CPR training.

摘要

目的

我们试图评估医务人员对院内和院外心脏骤停可能结果的了解情况,以及心脏病患者家属自我报告的心肺复苏培训转诊史。

方法

在一所大型城市医学院及其附属医疗中心,从三份人群名单中各随机抽取100人:(1)三、四年级医学生;(2)家庭医学、急诊医学、内科、麻醉科和外科的住院医师;(3)同一科室的主治医师。发放了一份问卷,以获取对院内和院外心脏骤停(分别为IHCA和OHCA)存活率的估计,以及心肺复苏培训转诊史。将估计值与已发表的数据进行准确性比较(IHCA:5 - 20%;OHCA:1 - 10%)

结果

总体回复率为63%。医学生、住院医师和主治医师对院内心脏骤停存活的准确估计[%(95%CI)]分别为51.1%(36.8 - 63.4%)、47.3%(35.9 - 58.7%)和36.7%(23.2 - 50.2%)。对院外心脏骤停存活的准确估计分别为51.1%(36.8 - 63.4%)、52.1%(40.6 - 63.5%)和70.8%(57.9 - 83.7%)。大多数人认为心脏病患者的家属应该接受心肺复苏培训(92.6%)。然而,在过去一年中很少有人转诊家属去培训(16.5%)。各应答组都强烈支持在高级心血管生命支持培训项目中纳入死亡通知信息,所有应答者中有80.4%表示赞成。

结论

本研究表明,医疗经验与对心脏骤停存活率的准确估计无关。绝大多数医务人员认为家属应接受心肺复苏培训,但很少有人转诊家属去接受心肺复苏培训。

相似文献

1
The knowledge and perceptions of medical personnel relating to outcome after cardiac arrest.医务人员对心脏骤停后预后的认识和看法。
Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.023. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
2
Changes in internal medicine residents' attitudes about resuscitation after cardiac arrest over a decade.十年来内科住院医师对心脏骤停后复苏态度的变化。
J Crit Care. 2009 Mar;24(1):141-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.012. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
3
Potential impact of a targeted cardiopulmonary resuscitation program for older adults on survival from private-residence cardiac arrest.一项针对老年人的靶向心肺复苏计划对私人住宅心脏骤停患者生存的潜在影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):7-12. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.041.
4
Residents feel unprepared and unsupervised as leaders of cardiac arrest teams in teaching hospitals: a survey of internal medicine residents.教学医院内科住院医师对担任心脏骤停团队领导者感到准备不足且缺乏监督:一项针对内科住院医师的调查
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jul;35(7):1668-72. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000268059.42429.39.
5
Utstein style analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--bystander CPR and end expired carbon dioxide.院外心脏骤停的 Utstein 式分析——旁观者心肺复苏与呼气末二氧化碳
Resuscitation. 2007 Mar;72(3):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
6
CPR training and CPR performance: do CPR-trained bystanders perform CPR?心肺复苏培训与心肺复苏操作:接受过心肺复苏培训的旁观者会实施心肺复苏吗?
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;13(6):596-601. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.021. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
7
Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Metropolitan Taipei: does an advanced life support service make a difference?台北都会区院外心脏骤停的结局:高级生命支持服务有作用吗?
Resuscitation. 2007 Sep;74(3):461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
8
Assessment of outcomes and differences between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support.评估使用体外生命支持进行心肺复苏治疗的院内和院外心脏骤停患者的结局和差异。
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):968-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
9
Effects of training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation on competence and patient outcome.心肺复苏培训对能力和患者结局的影响。
CMAJ. 1987 Sep 15;137(6):491-6.
10
Training rates and willingness to perform CPR in King County, Washington: a community survey.华盛顿州金县的心肺复苏术培训率和实施意愿:社区调查。
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):564-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of CASPRI, GO-FAR, PIHCA scores in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest; A five-year three center retrospective study in IRAN.验证 CASPRI、GO-FAR、PIHCA 评分在预测院内心脏骤停后良好神经结局的价值:伊朗五年三中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04229-8.
2
Validating the GO-FAR score: predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the Middle East.验证GO-FAR评分:预测中东地区院内心脏骤停的结局
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 22;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00749-4.
3
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation decision making: physicians' recommendations differ from the GO-FAR score predictions.
不进行心肺复苏的决策制定:医生的建议与GO-FAR评分预测结果不同。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 11;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00669-3.
4
To withhold resuscitation - The Swedish system's rules and challenges.放弃心肺复苏——瑞典体系的规则与挑战。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Nov 10;16:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100501. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
External validation of the Survival After ROSC in Cardiac Arrest (SARICA) score for predicting survival after return of spontaneous circulation using multinational pan-asian cohorts.利用多国泛亚队列对心脏骤停自主循环恢复后生存(SARICA)评分进行外部验证,以预测自主循环恢复后的生存情况。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 8;9:930226. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.930226. eCollection 2022.
6
Culture and personal influences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation- results of international survey.文化和个人因素对心肺复苏的影响——国际调查结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 26;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0439-x.
7
Factors associated with the decision to terminate resuscitation early for adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: Influence of family in an East Asian society.与成人院内心脏骤停早期停止复苏决策相关的因素:在东亚社会中家庭的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213168. eCollection 2019.
8
Validation of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) score in an East Asian population.验证心脏骤停复苏后院内(CASPRI)评分在东亚人群中的有效性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202938. eCollection 2018.
9
Age, sex, and hospital factors are associated with the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients who do not experience sustained return of spontaneous circulation.年龄、性别和医院因素与未实现自主循环持续恢复的住院患者的心肺复苏持续时间相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Dec;3(6):e001044. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001044.
10
Epidemiology and outcome of cardiac arrests reported in the lay-press: an observational study.在非专业媒体报道的心脏骤停的流行病学和结局:一项观察性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):525-31. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110228.