• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MuB蛋白通过噬菌体Mu的转座酶变构激活链转移。

MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu.

作者信息

Baker T A, Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1003-13. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90552-a.

DOI:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90552-a
PMID:1646076
Abstract

The MuA and MuB proteins collaborate to mediate efficient transposition of the phage Mu genome into many DNA target sites. MuA (the transposase) carries out all the DNA cleavage and joining steps. MuB stimulates strand transfer by activating the MuA-donor DNA complex through direct protein-protein contact. The C-terminal domain of MuA is required for this MuA-MuB interaction. Activation of strand transfer occurs irrespective of whether MuB is bound to target DNA. When high levels of MuA generate a pool of free MuB (not bound to DNA) or when chemical modification of MuB impairs its ability to bind DNA, MuB still stimulates strand transfer. However, under these conditions, intramolecular target sites are used exclusively because of their close proximity to the MuA-MuB-donor DNA complex.

摘要

MuA和MuB蛋白协同作用,介导噬菌体Mu基因组高效转座到许多DNA靶位点。MuA(转座酶)执行所有的DNA切割和连接步骤。MuB通过直接的蛋白质-蛋白质接触激活MuA-供体DNA复合物,从而刺激链转移。MuA的C末端结构域是这种MuA-MuB相互作用所必需的。无论MuB是否与靶DNA结合,链转移都会被激活。当高水平的MuA产生大量游离的MuB(未与DNA结合)时,或者当MuB的化学修饰损害其结合DNA的能力时,MuB仍然会刺激链转移。然而,在这些条件下,由于分子内靶位点与MuA-MuB-供体DNA复合物距离很近,所以只会使用分子内靶位点。

相似文献

1
MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu.MuB蛋白通过噬菌体Mu的转座酶变构激活链转移。
Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1003-13. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90552-a.
2
An ATP-ADP switch in MuB controls progression of the Mu transposition pathway.MuB中的ATP-ADP转换控制Mu转座途径的进程。
EMBO J. 1998 Sep 15;17(18):5509-18. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5509.
3
Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation.高效的Mu转座需要转座酶与Mu操纵子处的DNA序列相互作用:对调控的影响。
Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399-408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4.
4
Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase.Mu转座重组:Mu转座酶介导的供体DNA切割及反式链转移
Cell. 1996 Apr 19;85(2):271-80. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81103-4.
5
MuB is an AAA+ ATPase that forms helical filaments to control target selection for DNA transposition.MuB 是一种 AAA+ ATP 酶,它形成螺旋丝来控制 DNA 转座的靶标选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 2;110(27):E2441-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309499110. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Positional information within the Mu transposase tetramer: catalytic contributions of individual monomers.Mu转座酶四聚体内的位置信息:单个单体的催化作用
Cell. 1996 May 3;85(3):447-55. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81122-8.
7
Assembly of phage Mu transpososomes: cooperative transitions assisted by protein and DNA scaffolds.噬菌体Mu转座体的组装:由蛋白质和DNA支架辅助的协同转变
Cell. 1995 Nov 3;83(3):375-85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90115-9.
8
The wing of the enhancer-binding domain of Mu phage transposase is flexible and is essential for efficient transposition.Mu噬菌体转座酶增强子结合结构域的侧翼是灵活的,对高效转座至关重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1146-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1146.
9
Phage Mu transposition immunity: protein pattern formation along DNA by a diffusion-ratchet mechanism.噬菌体 Mu 转位免疫:扩散棘轮机制沿 DNA 形成蛋白质图案。
Mol Cell. 2010 Jul 9;39(1):48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.013.
10
The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function.噬菌体Mu转座体核心:组装和功能所需的DNA条件
EMBO J. 1995 Oct 2;14(19):4893-903. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00170.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Elucidating the Architectural dynamics of MuB filaments in bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition.阐明噬菌体 Mu DNA 转位中 MuB 丝的结构动力学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 31;15(1):6445. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50722-1.
2
Molecular basis for transposase activation by a dedicated AAA+ ATPase.通过专用 AAA+ ATP 酶激活转座酶的分子基础。
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8018):1003-1011. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07550-6. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
IS21 family transposase cleaved donor complex traps two right-handed superhelical crossings.IS21 家族转座酶切割供体复合物捕获两个右手超螺旋交叉。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 22;14(1):2335. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38071-x.
4
Structural basis for target site selection in RNA-guided DNA transposition systems.RNA 指导的 DNA 转座系统中靶位选择的结构基础。
Science. 2021 Aug 13;373(6556):768-774. doi: 10.1126/science.abi8976. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Mu transpososome activity-profiling yields hyperactive MuA variants for highly efficient genetic and genome engineering.Mu 转座子活性分析产生超活性 MuA 变体,用于高效的遗传和基因组工程。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 May 18;46(9):4649-4661. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1281.
6
An Atypical AAA+ ATPase Assembly Controls Efficient Transposition through DNA Remodeling and Transposase Recruitment.一种非典型AAA+ ATP酶组装体通过DNA重塑和转座酶招募来控制高效转座。
Cell. 2015 Aug 13;162(4):860-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.037.
7
Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX.由AAA+解折叠酶ClpX解析多组分识别信号的作用。
J Mol Biol. 2015 Sep 11;427(18):2966-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
MuB is an AAA+ ATPase that forms helical filaments to control target selection for DNA transposition.MuB 是一种 AAA+ ATP 酶,它形成螺旋丝来控制 DNA 转座的靶标选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 2;110(27):E2441-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309499110. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
9
Flexibility in MuA transposase family protein structures: functional mapping with scanning mutagenesis and sequence alignment of protein homologues.MuA 转座酶家族蛋白结构的灵活性:通过扫描诱变和蛋白同源物序列比对进行功能作图。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037922. Epub 2012 May 29.
10
Universal platform for quantitative analysis of DNA transposition.DNA 转座的通用定量分析平台。
Mob DNA. 2010 Nov 26;1(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-1-24.