Suppr超能文献

晨型/夜型的流行病学:年龄、性别、种族和社会经济因素对成年人(30 - 49岁)的影响

The epidemiology of morningness/eveningness: influence of age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors in adults (30-49 years).

作者信息

Paine Sarah-Jane, Gander Philippa H, Travier Noemie

机构信息

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Research School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Biol Rhythms. 2006 Feb;21(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/0748730405283154.

Abstract

The Horne and Ostberg Morningness/Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) is widely used to differentiate between morning and evening types, but there is very little epidemiological evidence about the distribution of MEQ chronotypes in the general population. The purpose of the present study was to simultaneously investigate the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and work factors on the distribution of morningness/eveningness. A New Zealand version of the MEQ was mailed to 5000 New Zealand adults, ages 30 to 49 years, who were randomly selected from the electoral rolls (55.7% response rate). A total of 2526 questionnaires were included in the analyses. According to the Horne and Ostberg classification, 49.8% of the total population was classified as morning type compared to 5.6% having an evening-type preference. However, using new cutoffs for middle-aged working adults described by Taillard et al. (2004), 24.7% of the population was morning type and 26.4% was evening type. After controlling for ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic deprivation, participants ages 30 to 34 years were more likely to be definitely evening type (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, p < 0.05) and less likely to be morning type (moderately morning type, OR = 0.59, p < 0.01, or definitely morning type, OR = 0.59, p < 0.05) compared to those ages 45 to 49 years. Work schedules were also important predictors of chronotype, with night workers more likely to be definitely evening type (OR = 1.49, p = 0.05) and the unemployed less likely to be moderately morning type (OR = 0.64, p < 0.05) compared to other workers. Evening types were 2.5 times more likely to report that their general health was only poor or fair compared to morning types (p < 0.01). This study confirms that the original criteria of Horne and Ostberg (1976) are not useful for classifying chronotypes in a middle-aged population. The authors conclude that morningness/eveningness preference is largely independent of ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic position, indicating that it is a stable characteristic that may be better explained by endogenous factors.

摘要

霍恩和奥斯特伯格晨型/夜型问卷(MEQ)被广泛用于区分晨型和夜型,但关于MEQ昼夜节律类型在普通人群中的分布,几乎没有流行病学证据。本研究的目的是同时调查人口统计学、社会经济和工作因素对晨型/夜型分布的影响。一份新西兰版的MEQ被邮寄给从选民名单中随机抽取的5000名年龄在30至49岁之间的新西兰成年人(回复率为55.7%)。共有2526份问卷纳入分析。根据霍恩和奥斯特伯格的分类,总人口中49.8%被归类为晨型,相比之下,有5.6%的人偏好夜型。然而,使用塔亚尔德等人(2004年)描述的中年在职成年人的新临界值,24.7%的人口为晨型,26.4%为夜型。在控制了种族、性别和社会经济剥夺因素后,与45至49岁的人相比,30至34岁的参与者更有可能确定为夜型(优势比[OR]=1.59,p<0.05),而不太可能是晨型(中度晨型,OR=0.59,p<0.01,或确定为晨型,OR=0.59,p<0.05)。工作时间表也是昼夜节律类型的重要预测因素,与其他工人相比,夜班工人更有可能确定为夜型(OR=1.49,p=0.05),而失业者不太可能是中度晨型(OR=0.64,p<0.05)。与晨型相比,夜型报告其总体健康状况仅为差或一般的可能性高2.5倍(p<0.01)。本研究证实,霍恩和奥斯特伯格(1976年)的原始标准对于中年人群昼夜节律类型的分类并无用处。作者得出结论,晨型/夜型偏好很大程度上独立于种族、性别和社会经济地位,这表明它是一种稳定的特征,可能更好地由内源性因素解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验