Fernández Esteve
Servicio de Prevención y Control del Cáncer, Institut Català d'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llogregat, Barcelona, España.
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:43-8. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72209-0.
Although there are many texts on the quality of epidemiological studies, little effort has been made to evaluate the publication of epidemiological studies and their results (the articles). Concern to improve the reporting of epidemiological studies prompted a working group to launch the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology Statement). The STROBE checklist contains 22 items organized according to the Title and Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion structure that can be used for the main epidemiological designs (cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies). It is a checklist to improve the reporting quality of epidemiological studies (generally original articles) and, therefore, to evaluate the quality of this type of publication and facilitate critical reading.
尽管有许多关于流行病学研究质量的文本,但在评估流行病学研究及其结果(文章)的发表方面所做的工作却很少。对改善流行病学研究报告的关注促使一个工作组发起了STROBE(加强流行病学观察性研究报告声明)。STROBE清单包含22项内容,按照标题和摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论的结构进行组织,可用于主要的流行病学设计(队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究)。它是一个用于提高流行病学研究(一般为原创文章)报告质量的清单,因此,用于评估这类出版物的质量并便于批判性阅读。