Söderqvist Anita, Strömberg Lars, Ponzer Sari, Tidermark Jan
Department of Orthopaedics, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Mar;15(3):308-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01296.x.
The aim of this study was to describe how nurses document their subjective assessment of the patients' cognitive status in the patients' records and to compare this documentation with an assessment made using a validated evaluation instrument in older patients with a hip fracture.
There are indications that older people with a hip fracture and impaired cognitive ability do not receive optimal care and that they suffer from a disproportionately high number of complications. Preventing and rapidly detecting confusion is probably an effective strategy for improving care for these patients. To be able to prevent care-related complications and plan for future nursing and medical care, it is necessary to identify patients with impaired cognitive ability.
Clinical trial including 362 patients.
The patients' cognitive function was assessed by a research nurse using a validated instrument, the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, and an independent subjective assessment was made by a ward nurse. The agreement between these assessments was analysed.
An assessment of cognitive function by the ward nurse was lacking in 12% of the patients. The assessment made by the nurses did not correspond to the level of orientation according to Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire in 24% of the patients. In the vast of majority of these cases, the patients were documented as being cognitively alert although they were cognitively impaired according to the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Among the patients who were cognitively oriented according to the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, the nurses' assessment identified 97% as oriented, but among the patients with impaired cognitive ability according to the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, only 58% were identified as being cognitively impaired by the ward nurses.
An assessment of cognitive function is still lacking in nursing records for a substantial number of older people with a hip fracture and cognitive dysfunction is frequently underdiagnosed in routine health care.
Patient care could be improved if the patients' cognitive function was assessed regularly and objectively by means of a validated evaluation instrument.
本研究旨在描述护士如何在患者病历中记录其对患者认知状态的主观评估,并将该记录与使用经过验证的评估工具对老年髋部骨折患者进行的评估进行比较。
有迹象表明,认知能力受损的老年髋部骨折患者未得到最佳护理,且他们遭受的并发症数量 disproportionately 地高。预防和快速发现意识混乱可能是改善这些患者护理的有效策略。为了能够预防与护理相关的并发症并规划未来的护理和医疗护理,有必要识别认知能力受损的患者。
包括362名患者的临床试验。
研究护士使用经过验证的工具“简短便携式精神状态问卷”对患者的认知功能进行评估,病房护士进行独立的主观评估。分析了这些评估之间的一致性。
12%的患者缺乏病房护士对认知功能的评估。护士的评估与根据“简短便携式精神状态问卷”得出的定向水平在24%的患者中不相符。在绝大多数这些病例中,尽管根据“简短便携式精神状态问卷”患者认知受损,但他们在病历中被记录为认知清醒。在根据“简短便携式精神状态问卷”认知定向的患者中,护士的评估将97%识别为定向,但在根据“简短便携式精神状态问卷”认知能力受损的患者中,只有58%被病房护士识别为认知受损。
大量老年髋部骨折患者的护理记录中仍缺乏对认知功能的评估,在常规医疗保健中认知功能障碍经常被漏诊。
如果通过经过验证的评估工具定期、客观地评估患者的认知功能,患者护理可以得到改善。