Pearce-Smith Nicola
Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Supporting Public Health, Oxford, UK.
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Mar;23(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00638.x.
To establish a journal club for librarians, which aimed to develop appraisal skills and assist in the application of research to practice.
Fourteen health librarians were invited to attend a journal club. Each month a librarian was responsible for preparing a scenario, choosing a research paper, and selecting a checklist. The paper was appraised by the club, and a critically appraised topic (CAT) prepared. Six months later, a questionnaire was sent to all librarians.
Six out of 14 librarians attended the journal club and five out of six returned the questionnaire. All five agreed that attending the journal club helped them develop appraisal skills, write a CAT and be more critical of research. Four agreed they always identified a research paper first, then formulated a question. One librarian agreed that applying results to their own practice was difficult, one disagreed and three were neutral.
Journal clubs can be effective at developing appraisal skills and writing a CAT, as well as increasing the reading of library research. Librarians still need assistance in identifying and using questions directly from their own practice. The journal club has helped some librarians to apply evidence to practice, but others find the research is not always directly relevant.
为图书馆员建立一个期刊俱乐部,旨在培养评估技能并协助将研究应用于实践。
邀请14名健康科学图书馆员参加一个期刊俱乐部。每月有一名图书馆员负责准备一个案例、选择一篇研究论文并挑选一份清单。俱乐部对论文进行评估,并准备一份批判性评估主题(CAT)。六个月后,向所有图书馆员发送了一份问卷。
14名图书馆员中有6名参加了期刊俱乐部,6名中有5名返回了问卷。所有5人都认为参加期刊俱乐部有助于他们培养评估技能、撰写CAT并对研究更加批判性地思考。4人同意他们总是先确定一篇研究论文,然后提出一个问题。一名图书馆员认为将结果应用于自己的实践很困难,一名不同意,三名持中立态度。
期刊俱乐部在培养评估技能和撰写CAT方面可能是有效的,同时也增加了图书馆研究的阅读量。图书馆员在直接从自己的实践中识别和使用问题方面仍然需要帮助。期刊俱乐部帮助一些图书馆员将证据应用于实践,但其他人发现研究并不总是直接相关。