van Dijk J G, Reenalda H, Bollen E L, den Heijer J C
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Apr;31(3):145-50.
The variability inherent in nerve conduction velocity (NCV) studies suggests that multiple measurements may yield more information than a single measurement. To test this hypothesis, three motor nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) of the peroneal nerve were measured: to the extensor digitorum brevis muscle over the fibular head and in the lower leg, and to the tibialis anterior muscle over the fibular head. Three groups were studied: controls, polyneuropathy cases and peroneal pressure neuropathy cases. Over the fibular head, NCVs recorded from the tibialis anterior were consistently higher than those from the extensor digitorum brevis, and showed a higher number of abnormalities. Differences between NCVs, their Z-scores and Mahalanobis distances were compared to study the influence of variance differences and covariances. The best compromise between true and false positives was found to be a comparison between NCVs over the fibular head recorded from the tibialis anterior and the leg segment recorded from the extensor digitorum muscle. Z-scores are more useful than Mahalanobis distances in this respect.
神经传导速度(NCV)研究中固有的变异性表明,多次测量可能比单次测量能提供更多信息。为了验证这一假设,测量了腓总神经的三个运动神经传导速度:在腓骨头上方和小腿处至趾短伸肌,以及在腓骨头上方至胫骨前肌。研究了三组:对照组、多发性神经病病例组和腓总神经压迫性神经病病例组。在腓骨头上方,从胫骨前肌记录的神经传导速度始终高于从趾短伸肌记录的速度,且异常数量更多。比较了神经传导速度之间的差异、它们的Z分数和马氏距离,以研究方差差异和协方差的影响。发现真阳性和假阳性之间的最佳折衷是比较从胫骨前肌记录的腓骨头上方的神经传导速度和从趾短伸肌记录的小腿节段的神经传导速度。在这方面,Z分数比马氏距离更有用。