Brown W F, Watson B V
Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Muscle Nerve. 1991 Mar;14(3):237-44. doi: 10.1002/mus.880140307.
We compared conduction in motor fibers supplying the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) and anterior lateral compartment (AL) muscles. The object was to determine whether there were any differences in the relative proportions of degenerated and blocked nerve fibers between the longer EDB and shorter AL fibers. In almost every case the percentage of motor fibers undergoing axonal degeneration was greatest in EDB fibers. Conversely, the percentage of conduction block was greatest in the AL motor fibers. As clinical recovery is dependent on AL muscles rather than EDB, electrophysiological study of the relative proportions of degenerated and blocked fibers in the former should provide a more reliable measure of outcome than similar studies of EDB. Conduction velocity distal to the fibular head was not slowed despite the large loss of EDB motor fibers. Evidence for selective involvement of the larger myelinated fibers is, therefore, lacking. The location of the major conduction abnormalities was in almost every case between the mid-fibular head and popliteal fossa.
我们比较了支配趾短伸肌(EDB)和前外侧肌间隔(AL)肌肉的运动纤维的传导情况。目的是确定较长的EDB纤维和较短的AL纤维之间,变性和阻滞神经纤维的相对比例是否存在差异。几乎在每种情况下,发生轴突变性的运动纤维百分比在EDB纤维中最高。相反,传导阻滞的百分比在AL运动纤维中最高。由于临床恢复取决于AL肌肉而非EDB,因此对前者中变性和阻滞纤维相对比例的电生理研究,应比EDB的类似研究提供更可靠的预后指标。尽管EDB运动纤维大量丧失,但腓骨头远端的传导速度并未减慢。因此,缺乏大的有髓纤维选择性受累的证据。几乎在每种情况下,主要传导异常的位置都在腓骨头中部和腘窝之间。