van Brakel Wim H, Anderson Alison M, Mutatkar R K, Bakirtzief Zoica, Nicholls Peter G, Raju M S, Das-Pattanayak Robert K
Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Leprosy Unit, Wibautstraat 137 J, 1097 DN Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Feb 28;28(4):193-203. doi: 10.1080/09638280500192785.
To develop a scale to measure (social) participation for use in rehabilitation, stigma reduction and social integration programmes.
A scale development study was carried out in Nepal, India and Brazil using standard methods. The instrument was to be based on the Participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), be cross-cultural in nature and assess client-perceived participation. Respondents rated their participation in comparison with a "peer", defined as "someone similar to the respondent in all respects except for the disease or disability".
An 18-item instrument was developed in seven languages. Crohnbach's alpha was 0.92, intra-tester stability 0.83 and inter-tester reliability 0.80. Discrimination between controls and clients was good at a Participation Score threshold of 12. Responsiveness after a "life change" was according to expectation.
The Participation Scale is reliable and valid to measure client-perceived participation in people affected by leprosy or disability. It is expected to be valid in other (stigmatised) conditions also, but this needs confirmation. The scale allows collection of participation data and impact assessment of interventions to improve social participation. Such data may be compared between clients, interventions and programmes. The scale is suitable for use in institutions, but also at the peripheral level.
开发一种用于康复、减少耻辱感和社会融合项目的(社会)参与度测量量表。
在尼泊尔、印度和巴西采用标准方法开展了一项量表开发研究。该工具将基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)的参与领域,具有跨文化性质,并评估服务对象所感知到的参与度。受访者将自己的参与情况与“同龄人”进行比较,“同龄人”定义为“除疾病或残疾外,在各方面都与受访者相似的人”。
开发了一种有七种语言版本的包含18个条目的工具。克朗巴赫α系数为0.92,测试者内稳定性为0.83,测试者间信度为0.80。在参与得分阈值为12时,对照组与服务对象之间的区分度良好。“生活变化”后的反应度符合预期。
参与度量表在测量麻风病患者或残疾人所感知到的参与度方面是可靠且有效的。预计在其他(有耻辱感的)情况下也有效,但这需要得到证实。该量表有助于收集参与度数据,并对改善社会参与度的干预措施进行效果评估。这些数据可在服务对象、干预措施和项目之间进行比较。该量表适用于机构使用,也适用于基层层面。