Antunes Ana Amélia Moraes, Neves Graciandre Almeida, Rojas Bianca Pantuzza Santana, Vaz Daniela Virgínia
Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Physical Therapist at Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Physical Therapist at Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Jan-Feb;29(1):101152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.
To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.
Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.
Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (p < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.
The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.
参与被视为康复的核心成果,需要从重视个人价值观和偏好的角度进行适当评估。巴西版的《参与和自主影响量表》(IPA-Br4)是巴西唯一从主观角度评估参与情况的合适工具。
调查IPA-Br4数字版对身体残疾个体的重测信度和内部结构(结构效度和内部一致性)。
采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度,采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度,采用Cronbach α评估内部一致性。
分别有30名(年龄43.25±10.6岁,女性占63.3%)和130名(年龄47.51±15.73岁,男性占58.5%)个体参与了重测信度和结构效度评估。各领域的ICC分别为:室内自主性=0.84;家庭角色=0.87;社会生活与关系=0.87;室外自主性=0.84。四因素CFA模型显示拟合良好,因子载荷表明所有项目均加载到各自的因子上,大小>0.30(p<0.05)。所有Cronbach α值(内部一致性)均高于0.82。
IPA-Br4数字版具有足够的重测信度和内部结构,可用于身体残疾的成年人。