Suppr超能文献

针对身体残疾个体的巴西版参与和自主影响量表(IPA-Br4)的重测信度和内部结构

Test-retest reliability and internal structure of the Brazilian version of the impact on participation and autonomy (IPA-Br4) for individuals with physical disabilities.

作者信息

Antunes Ana Amélia Moraes, Neves Graciandre Almeida, Rojas Bianca Pantuzza Santana, Vaz Daniela Virgínia

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; Physical Therapist at Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Physical Therapist at Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Jan-Feb;29(1):101152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.

METHODS

Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.

RESULTS

Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (p < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.

CONCLUSION

The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.

摘要

背景

参与被视为康复的核心成果,需要从重视个人价值观和偏好的角度进行适当评估。巴西版的《参与和自主影响量表》(IPA-Br4)是巴西唯一从主观角度评估参与情况的合适工具。

目的

调查IPA-Br4数字版对身体残疾个体的重测信度和内部结构(结构效度和内部一致性)。

方法

采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度,采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度,采用Cronbach α评估内部一致性。

结果

分别有30名(年龄43.25±10.6岁,女性占63.3%)和130名(年龄47.51±15.73岁,男性占58.5%)个体参与了重测信度和结构效度评估。各领域的ICC分别为:室内自主性=0.84;家庭角色=0.87;社会生活与关系=0.87;室外自主性=0.84。四因素CFA模型显示拟合良好,因子载荷表明所有项目均加载到各自的因子上,大小>0.30(p<0.05)。所有Cronbach α值(内部一致性)均高于0.82。

结论

IPA-Br4数字版具有足够的重测信度和内部结构,可用于身体残疾的成年人。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验