• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于治疗骨骼未成熟运动员近端前交叉韧带损伤的微创技术(“愈合反应”)

A minimally invasive technique ("healing response") to treat proximal ACL injuries in skeletally immature athletes.

作者信息

Steadman J Richard, Cameron-Donaldson Michelle L, Briggs Karen K, Rodkey William G

机构信息

Steadman Hawkins Research Foundation, Dept of Clinical Research, Vail, CO 81657, USA.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2006 Jan;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248070.

DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1248070
PMID:16468488
Abstract

This study documents outcomes of athletically active, skeletally immature patients with proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears treated with a non-reconstructive technique to promote healing ("healing response"). Between 1992 and 1998, 13 skeletally immature athletes with proximal ACL tears underwent a healing response procedure. Patients with previous ACL injury, other concurrent ligament pathology, and/or complete mid-substance ACL tears were excluded. Average preoperative KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum difference for all patients was 5 mm (range: 3-10 mm). Preoperatively, all patients had a 1+ or 2+ pivot shift, and all patients reported knee function as abnormal or severely abnormal. Patients were followed prospectively with clinical examinations, KT-1000 testing, and subjective questionnaires. Three (23%) patients had a re-injury 30 to 55 months after the healing response and underwent subsequent ACL reconstruction. Subjective follow-up on the remaining 10 patients at an average of 69 months (range: 26-113 months) postoperatively indicated no patients experienced pain or giving way, and all considered their knee function normal. Average Lysholm score was 96, Tegner score was 8.5 (range: 7-10), and patient satisfaction at follow-up was 9.9 (1=very dissatisfied and 10=very satisfied). Clinical examination at least one year postoperatively was performed on 7 of 10 patients at 35 months (range: 12-63 months). Five patients had a negative pivot shift and 2 had a 1+ pivot shift. KT-1000 measurements improved to 2 mm (range: 0-3 mm). In the athletically active, skeletally immature patient, the healing response procedure can restore stability and knee function, with proper patient selection. In this study group, patients were very satisfied with the procedure and returned to a high level of sports and activities.

摘要

本研究记录了采用非重建技术促进愈合(“愈合反应”)治疗的骨骼未成熟、运动活跃的前交叉韧带(ACL)近端撕裂患者的治疗结果。1992年至1998年期间,13名骨骼未成熟的ACL近端撕裂运动员接受了愈合反应手术。排除既往有ACL损伤、其他并发韧带病变和/或ACL实质中部完全撕裂的患者。所有患者术前KT-1000关节测量仪手动最大差值平均为5mm(范围:3-10mm)。术前,所有患者均有1+或2+的轴移,且所有患者均报告膝关节功能异常或严重异常。对患者进行前瞻性随访,包括临床检查、KT-1000测试和主观问卷调查。3例(23%)患者在愈合反应后30至55个月再次受伤,随后接受了ACL重建。其余10例患者术后平均69个月(范围:26-113个月)的主观随访表明,没有患者出现疼痛或打软腿,所有患者均认为其膝关节功能正常。Lysholm评分平均为96分,Tegner评分为8.5分(范围:7-10分),随访时患者满意度为9.9分(1分为非常不满意,10分为非常满意)。10例患者中的7例在术后35个月(范围:12-63个月)进行了至少一年的临床检查。5例患者轴移阴性,2例患者有1+轴移。KT-1000测量值改善至2mm(范围:0-3mm)。对于骨骼未成熟、运动活跃的患者,在进行适当的患者选择后,愈合反应手术可以恢复膝关节稳定性和功能。在本研究组中,患者对该手术非常满意,并恢复到高水平的运动和活动。

相似文献

1
A minimally invasive technique ("healing response") to treat proximal ACL injuries in skeletally immature athletes.一种用于治疗骨骼未成熟运动员近端前交叉韧带损伤的微创技术(“愈合反应”)
J Knee Surg. 2006 Jan;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248070.
2
Short term results of anterior cruciate ligament augmentation in professional and amateur athletes.职业和业余运动员前交叉韧带增强术的短期结果
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):171-176. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0447-x. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
Return to sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature athletes with manual drilling original all inside reconstruction at 8 years follow-up.8年随访:骨骼未成熟运动员采用手工钻孔原位全内置重建术重建前交叉韧带后恢复运动活动情况
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):635-638. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
4
All-Inside, All-Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Athletes: Return to Sport, Incidence of Second Surgery, and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes.骨骼未成熟运动员全关节内、全骨骺前交叉韧带重建:重返运动、二次手术发生率及2年临床结果
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):856-863. doi: 10.1177/0363546516677723. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
5
Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.一种联合前交叉韧带和前外侧韧带重建技术的结果:至少2年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
6
Micheli Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Youths: A Retrospective Case Series With a Mean 3-Year Follow-up.米凯利法治疗骨骼未成熟青少年前交叉韧带重建:一项平均随访3年的回顾性病例系列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2974-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608477. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
[Medium- to long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and repair in healing response technique].[前交叉韧带断裂并采用愈合反应技术修复后的中长期随访]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Dec;151(6):570-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350874. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
8
Effects of pre-operative knee laxity on clinical outcomes after partial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.术前膝关节松弛对前交叉韧带部分重建术后临床疗效的影响。
Knee. 2018 Jun;25(3):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
9
Long-term Outcomes of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Combined With Biologic Healing Augmentation to Treat Incomplete Tears.前交叉韧带初次修复联合生物愈合增强治疗不完全撕裂的长期疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3368-3377. doi: 10.1177/0363546518805740. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
10
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation: Early Results of a Novel Arthroscopic Technique for Suture Anchor Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.前交叉韧带保留:一种用于缝线锚钉初次前交叉韧带修复的新型关节镜技术的早期结果
Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament injury: a global expert consensus statement.前交叉韧带近端损伤的一期修复:一项全球专家共识声明
Burns Trauma. 2025 May 24;13:tkae079. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae079. eCollection 2025.
2
Arthroscopic repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears in children and adolescents: A systematic review.儿童和青少年前交叉韧带近端撕裂的关节镜修复:一项系统评价
J Child Orthop. 2024 Apr 12;18(3):249-257. doi: 10.1177/18632521241244626. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Early Complication Analysis of Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization versus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
动态韧带内稳定术与前交叉韧带重建术的早期并发症分析
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1022. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071022.
4
Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations.原发性近端前交叉韧带修复:不同关节镜缝合构型的生物力学评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):2340. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062340.
5
Patients with Small Acetabular Cartilage Defects Caused by Femoroacetabular Impingement Do Not Benefit from Microfracture.由股骨髋臼撞击症导致的小髋臼软骨缺损患者无法从微骨折手术中获益。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6283. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216283.
6
Fibrin-Based Biomaterial Systems to Enhance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing.用于促进前交叉韧带愈合的基于纤维蛋白的生物材料系统
Med Devices Sens. 2021 Feb;4(1). doi: 10.1002/mds3.10147. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Autologous Minimally Invasive Cell-Based Therapy for Meniscal and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Regeneration.用于半月板和前交叉韧带再生的自体微创细胞疗法。
Case Rep Orthop. 2021 Jun 24;2021:6614232. doi: 10.1155/2021/6614232. eCollection 2021.
8
Influential Articles on Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Bibliometric Analysis.关于儿童和青少年前交叉韧带损伤的有影响力的文章:文献计量分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):23259671211010772. doi: 10.1177/23259671211010772. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Suture Augmentation for Proximal Avulsion Injuries.缝线增强修复前交叉韧带近端撕脱伤
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug 20;2(5):e475-e480. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.003. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears-Part 2: The Role of Internal Bracing on Gap Formation and Stabilization of Repair Techniques.急性前交叉韧带近端撕裂的治疗——第二部分:内部支撑在修复技术间隙形成和稳定中的作用
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):2325967119897423. doi: 10.1177/2325967119897423. eCollection 2020 Jan.