Dewan Harisha, Sayed Mohammed E, Jundus Asayil, Gharawi Mafaz, Baeshen Safeyah, Alali Maimonah, Almarzouki Mai, Jokhadar Hossam F, AlResayes Saad Saleh, Al Wadei Mohammed H D, Thubab Abdulaziz, Abu Illah Mohammed Jabril, Moafa Alkhansa
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;15(21):4284. doi: 10.3390/polym15214284.
The aim of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of 3D-printed and milled provisional restorations using various resin materials and surface finishes. There were 160 preliminary samples in all, and they were split into two groups: the milled group and the 3D-printed group. Based on the resin used for repair (composite or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) and the type of surface treatment utilized (chemical or mechanical), each group was further divided into subgroups. The specimens were subjected to thermocycling from 5 °C to 55 °C for up to 5000 thermal cycles with a dwell time of 30 s. The mechanical qualities of the repaired material underwent testing for shear bond strength (SBS). To identify the significant differences between the groups and subgroups, a statistical analysis was carried out. Three-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effects of each independent component (the material and the bonding condition), as well as the interaction between the independent factors on shear bond strength. Tukey multiple post-hoc tests were used to compare the mean results for each material under various bonding circumstances. The shear bond strengths of the various groups and subgroups differed significantly ( < 0.05). When compared to the milled group, the 3D-printed group had a much greater mean shear bond strength. When compared to PMMA repair, the composite resin material showed a noticeably greater shear bond strength. In terms of surface treatments, the samples with mechanical and chemical surface treatments had stronger shear bonds than those that had not received any. The results of this study demonstrate the effect of the fabrication method, resin type, and surface treatment on the shear bond strength of restored provisional restorations. Particularly when made using composite material and given surface treatments, 3D-printed provisional restorations showed exceptional mechanical qualities. These results can help dentists choose the best fabrication methods, resin materials, and surface treatments through which to increase the durability and bond strength of temporary prosthesis.
本研究的目的是评估使用各种树脂材料和表面处理的3D打印和铣削临时修复体的剪切粘结强度。总共160个初步样本,分为两组:铣削组和3D打印组。根据用于修复的树脂(复合树脂或聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA))以及所采用的表面处理类型(化学或机械),每组进一步细分为亚组。将标本在5°C至55°C之间进行热循环,最多5000个热循环,保压时间为30秒。对修复材料的机械性能进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。为了确定组间和亚组间的显著差异,进行了统计分析。采用三因素方差分析来分析每个独立因素(材料和粘结条件)的影响,以及独立因素之间对剪切粘结强度的相互作用。使用Tukey多重事后检验来比较各种粘结情况下每种材料的平均结果。各组和亚组的剪切粘结强度差异显著(<0.05)。与铣削组相比,3D打印组的平均剪切粘结强度要高得多。与PMMA修复相比,复合树脂材料的剪切粘结强度明显更高。在表面处理方面,经过机械和化学表面处理的样本比未经过任何处理的样本具有更强的剪切粘结力。本研究结果证明了制作方法、树脂类型和表面处理对修复临时修复体剪切粘结强度的影响。特别是当使用复合材料并进行表面处理时,3D打印临时修复体表现出优异的机械性能。这些结果可以帮助牙医选择最佳的制作方法、树脂材料和表面处理,以提高临时假体的耐久性和粘结强度。