Nickelsen Kärin
History and Philosophy of Science, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2006 Mar;37(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.12.001.
At first glance botanical illustrations of the eighteenth century might be interpreted as being naturalistic portraits of living plants. A more detailed investigation, however, reveals that the pictures were meant to communicate typical features of plant species in the way of a model. To this end, botanists of the period gave botanical draughtsmen specialist training; copying earlier examples and standardised motives from drawing books was a common part of this training. The practice of copying elements of previously published drawings and integrating them into new pictures was also widespread. However, only carefully selected elements were taken over, and even these were improved in terms of their correctness and appropriateness to the new context. This procedure was a strategy that eighteenth-century botanists used so that they would present an illustration that met their own requirements more satisfactorily than existing depictions. From this perspective, botanical illustrations can serve as historical sources on the working practices of eighteenth-century botanists and draughtsmen, which are usually not mentioned in textual sources.
乍一看,18世纪的植物插图可能会被解读为对活体植物的自然主义描绘。然而,更深入的研究表明,这些图片旨在以模型的方式传达植物物种的典型特征。为此,那个时期的植物学家对植物绘图员进行了专业培训;临摹早期的范例以及绘图册中的标准化图案是这种培训的常见内容。复制先前已出版绘图的元素并将其融入新图片的做法也很普遍。然而,只有经过精心挑选的元素才会被采用,即便如此,这些元素在准确性和与新背景的适配性方面也会得到改进。这一过程是18世纪植物学家采用的一种策略,以便他们能够呈现出一幅比现有描绘更能满足自身要求的插图。从这个角度来看,植物插图可以作为18世纪植物学家和绘图员工作方式的历史资料来源,而这些工作方式在文字资料中通常不会被提及。