Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S, Goldenfeld N, Delaney J, Fine D, Smith R, Weil L, Wakabayashi A
Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Rd., Cambridge CB2 2AH, UK.
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.012. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
Empathizing is a specific component of social cognition. Empathizing is also specifically impaired in autism spectrum condition (ASC). These are two dimensions, measurable using the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). ASC also involves strong systemizing, a dimension measured using the Systemizing Quotient (SQ). The present study examined the relationship between the EQ, AQ and SQ. The EQ and SQ have been used previously to test for sex differences in 5 'brain types' (Types S, E, B and extremes of Type S or E). Finally, people with ASC have been conceptualized as an extreme of the male brain.
We revised the SQ to avoid a traditionalist bias, thus producing the SQ-Revised (SQ-R). AQ and EQ were not modified. All 3 were administered online.
Students (723 males, 1038 females) were compared to a group of adults with ASC group (69 males, 56 females).
(1) To report scores from the SQ-R. (2) To test for SQ-R differences among students in the sciences vs. humanities. (3) To test if AQ can be predicted from EQ and SQ-R scores. (4) To test for sex differences on each of these in a typical sample, and for the absence of a sex difference in a sample with ASC if both males and females with ASC are hyper-masculinized. (5) To report percentages of males, females and people with an ASC who show each brain type.
AQ score was successfully predicted from EQ and SQ-R scores. In the typical group, males scored significantly higher than females on the AQ and SQ-R, and lower on the EQ. The ASC group scored higher than sex-matched controls on the SQ-R, and showed no sex differences on any of the 3 measures. More than twice as many typical males as females were Type S, and more than twice as many typical females as males were Type E. The majority of adults with ASC were Extreme Type S, compared to 5% of typical males and 0.9% of typical females. The EQ had a weak negative correlation with the SQ-R.
Empathizing is largely but not completely independent of systemizing. The weak but significant negative correlation may indicate a trade-off between them. ASC involves impaired empathizing alongside intact or superior systemizing. Future work should investigate the biological basis of these dimensions, and the small trade-off between them.
共情是社会认知的一个特定组成部分。在自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)中,共情也会受到特定损害。这是两个维度,可以使用共情商数(EQ)和自闭症谱系商数(AQ)来衡量。ASC还涉及强烈的系统化,这是一个使用系统化商数(SQ)来衡量的维度。本研究考察了EQ、AQ和SQ之间的关系。EQ和SQ此前已被用于测试5种“脑类型”(S型、E型、B型以及S型或E型的极端情况)中的性别差异。最后,患有ASC的人被概念化为男性大脑的极端情况。
我们对SQ进行了修订以避免传统主义偏见,从而产生了修订后的SQ(SQ-R)。AQ和EQ未作修改。所有三项测试均通过在线方式进行。
将学生(723名男性,1038名女性)与一组患有ASC的成年人(69名男性,56名女性)进行比较。
(1)报告SQ-R的得分。(2)测试理工科学生与文科学生在SQ-R上的差异。(3)测试是否可以根据EQ和SQ-R得分预测AQ。(4)在典型样本中测试这些指标上的性别差异,以及如果患有ASC的男性和女性都过度男性化,那么在患有ASC的样本中是否不存在性别差异。(5)报告表现出每种脑类型的男性、女性和患有ASC的人的百分比。
成功根据EQ和SQ-R得分预测了AQ得分。在典型组中,男性在AQ和SQ-R上的得分显著高于女性,而在EQ上的得分低于女性。ASC组在SQ-R上的得分高于性别匹配的对照组,并且在这三项指标中的任何一项上均未表现出性别差异。典型男性中S型的人数是女性的两倍多,典型女性中E型的人数是男性的两倍多。与5%的典型男性和0.9%的典型女性相比,大多数患有ASC的成年人是极端S型。EQ与SQ-R呈弱负相关。
共情在很大程度上但并非完全独立于系统化。这种微弱但显著的负相关可能表明它们之间存在权衡。ASC涉及共情受损以及完整或优越的系统化。未来的研究应该调查这些维度的生物学基础以及它们之间的微小权衡。