Eldevik Sigmund, Eikeseth Svein, Jahr Erik, Smith Tristram
Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Feb;36(2):211-24. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0058-x.
We retrospectively compared 2 groups of children receiving either behavioral treatment (n = 13) or eclectic treatment (n = 15) for an average of 12 hours per week. Children were assessed on intelligence, language, adaptive functioning and maladaptive behavior at pretreatment and 2 years into treatment. The groups did not differ significantly at pretreatment. After 2 years of treatment, the behavioral group made larger gains than the eclectic group in most areas. However, gains were more modest than those reported in previous studies with children receiving more intensive behavioral treatment, and it is questionable whether they were clinically significant.
我们回顾性比较了两组儿童,一组接受行为治疗(n = 13),另一组接受综合治疗(n = 15),平均每周治疗12小时。在治疗前以及治疗2年后,对儿童的智力、语言、适应性功能和不良行为进行了评估。两组在治疗前没有显著差异。经过2年的治疗,行为治疗组在大多数方面的改善比综合治疗组更大。然而,与之前接受更强化行为治疗的儿童研究相比,这些改善较为有限,其临床意义也值得怀疑。