Schmidt René, Richter Marcus, Gleichsner Franziska, Geiger Peter, Puhl Wolfhart, Cakir Balkan
Department of Orthopedics and SCI, Orthopädische Klinik mit Querschnittgelähmtenzentrum, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Apr;126(3):150-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0046-9. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
Atlantoaxial instabilities, which require surgical fixation follow a variety of clinical disorders. Different surgical procedures are used for stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex, mainly posterior wiring techniques and transarticular screw fixation. Nowadays, often a combination of transarticular screws and a posterior one-point fixation is used to achieve a three-point fixation, with superior biomechanical stability and good clinical results. Different modifications were developed to improve this technique. In 1995, a percutaneous approach for atlantoaxial stabilization was introduced. In clinical studies, the technique showed a tendency towards better outcome. Beside the outcome, the intraoperative performance is of special interest for minimal invasive approaches. We therefore compared the operation time, screw angulation and blood loss, between the open and percutaneous posterior atlantoaxial techniques.
Two groups, each consisting of 17 patients, with either open (group 1) or percutaneous (group 2) atlantoxial stabilization, were compared. The operation time was retrospectively acquired from the patient's charts. The data for blood loss was provided by our anaesthesiological department, separated for intraoperative, postoperative and total blood loss. Screw angulation was measured on the postoperative x-ray by an orthopaedic surgeon.
The percutaneous group showed an average intraoperative blood loss of 239.7 ml, compared to 929.4 ml for the open group (p< or =0.001). The analogue values for the postoperative blood loss were 142.9 ml and 379.4 ml for group 2 and group 1, respectively (p=0.008). Consecutively, the total blood loss showed also a statistically significant difference (p< or =0.001). The operation time was significantly different (p< or =0.001), with average values of 175.3 min (group 1) and 110.6 min (group 2). Screw angulation showed a trend towards a steeper angulation in the percutaneous group with an average angle of 56.8 degrees , compared to 53.9 degrees (group 1), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.053).
The percutaneous technique for atlantoaxial stabilization with a three-point fixation has clear intraoperative benefits, with shorter operation time and reduced blood loss. A trend towards steeper screw angulation was found and shows at least equal feasibility for transarticular screw placement with the percutaneous technique, compared to the standard open approach.
寰枢椎不稳需手术固定,其继发于多种临床病症。用于稳定寰枢椎复合体的手术方法各异,主要有后路钢丝技术和经关节螺钉固定。如今,常联合使用经关节螺钉和后路单点固定以实现三点固定,从而获得更好的生物力学稳定性和良好的临床效果。人们对该技术进行了不同改进。1995年,引入了一种经皮寰枢椎稳定术。在临床研究中,该技术显示出更好预后的趋势。除了预后,对于微创方法而言,术中操作表现也尤为重要。因此,我们比较了开放和经皮后路寰枢椎技术的手术时间、螺钉角度及失血量。
比较两组患者,每组各17例,分别接受开放(第1组)或经皮(第2组)寰枢椎稳定术。手术时间通过回顾患者病历获取。失血量数据由麻醉科提供,分为术中、术后及总失血量。螺钉角度由骨科医生在术后X线片上测量。
经皮组术中平均失血量为239.7毫升,而开放组为929.4毫升(p≤0.001)。第2组和第1组术后失血量的相应数值分别为142.9毫升和379.4毫升(p = 0.008)。相应地,总失血量也存在统计学显著差异(p≤0.001)。手术时间有显著差异(p≤0.001),平均手术时间分别为175.3分钟(第1组)和110.6分钟(第2组)。螺钉角度显示经皮组有角度更陡的趋势,平均角度为56.8度,而第1组为53.9度,尽管这在统计学上不显著(p = 0.053)。
采用三点固定的经皮寰枢椎稳定技术在术中具有明显优势,手术时间更短且失血量减少。发现了螺钉角度更陡的趋势,并且与标准开放方法相比,经皮技术在经关节螺钉置入方面至少具有同等的可行性。