Room Robin
Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Stockholm University, Sweden.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2005 Dec;37(4):373-83. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2005.10399810.
The April, 2003 meeting of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, and the meetings and other efforts to influence it sponsored by interested parties before and around the Commission meeting, are described and analyzed. The 2003 meeting was seen as significant because it was the occasion for assessments of progress on the process goals set out in the United National General Assembly Special Session on drugs in 1998. Debate and discussion of the text of resolutions in the Commission meetings are analyzed in terms of the major points of conflict in 2003 between national delegations--cannabis policies, harm reduction, substitution therapy, and preferences for dramatizing or matter-of-fact language. Also discussed are the drift toward a crime rubric for the drug control system, and the increasing distance between the focus of the system on policing and the focus of most Western European governments on drugs as welfare or health issues. It is concluded that the system seems to be at a stalemate.
本文描述并分析了2003年4月麻醉药品委员会会议,以及在该委员会会议之前及会议期间由相关方发起的旨在影响该会议的各类会议和其他活动。2003年的会议被视为具有重要意义,因为它是对1998年联合国毒品问题特别会议所设定的进程目标的进展情况进行评估的契机。从2003年各国代表团之间的主要冲突点——大麻政策、减少伤害、替代疗法以及对生动或平实语言的偏好等方面,对委员会会议上决议文本的辩论和讨论进行了分析。还讨论了毒品管制系统向犯罪类别转变的趋势,以及该系统在治安方面的重点与大多数西欧国家政府将毒品视为福利或健康问题的重点之间日益加大的差距。得出的结论是,该系统似乎陷入了僵局。