Suppr超能文献

听觉变化检测和注意力的非自愿控制基于两种不同的机制。

Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.

作者信息

Rinne Teemu, Särkkä Anna, Degerman Alexander, Schröger Erich, Alho Kimmo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2006 Mar 10;1077(1):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043. Epub 2006 Feb 20.

Abstract

We used behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures to study the neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to changes in unattended sounds. Our subjects discriminated two equiprobable sounds differing in frequency (fundamental frequency 186 or 196 Hz) while task-irrelevant intensity decrements or increments (-3, -6, -9, +3, +6, or +9 dB, standard intensity 60 dB HL) infrequently occurred in the same sounds. In line with the results of previous studies, discrimination performance deteriorated with increasing magnitude of the task-irrelevant intensity change. However, these distraction effects were dissimilar for intensity increments and decrements: while there were no differences in reaction time (RT) between intensity decrements and increments, hit rates (HR) were lower for large intensity increments than for large decrements. ERPs to task-irrelevant intensity increments and decrements were also distinctly different: the response to intensity increments consisted of an N1 enhancement, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a, while the response to intensity decrements consisted only of MMN. These results are consistent with the assumption that two separate mechanisms (indexed by N1 and MMN) underlie auditory change detection. However, the finding that distinct distraction effects were obtained for both intensity decrements and increments but that the P3a is elicited only by the intensity increments seems to suggest that P3a may not be regarded as a general index of attentional shift but rather it is only generated in conditions in which an enhanced N1 is elicited, too.

摘要

我们使用行为学和事件相关电位(ERP)测量方法来研究非自愿注意转向未被关注声音变化的神经机制。我们的受试者辨别两种等概率出现的、频率不同(基频为186或196赫兹)的声音,同时与任务无关的强度递减或递增(-3、-6、-9、+3、+6或+9分贝,标准强度为60分贝听力级)偶尔会出现在相同的声音中。与先前研究结果一致,随着与任务无关的强度变化幅度增加,辨别性能下降。然而,这些干扰效应在强度递增和递减时是不同的:虽然强度递减和递增之间的反应时间(RT)没有差异,但大强度递增时的命中率(HR)低于大强度递减时。与任务无关的强度递增和递减所引发的ERP也明显不同:对强度递增的反应包括N1增强、失匹配负波(MMN)和P3a,而对强度递减的反应仅包括MMN。这些结果与以下假设一致,即两种独立的机制(由N1和MMN表征)构成听觉变化检测的基础。然而,强度递减和递增均获得明显不同的干扰效应,但P3a仅由强度递增引发这一发现似乎表明,P3a可能不应被视为注意力转移的一般指标,而是仅在也引发增强的N1的条件下产生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验