Suppr超能文献

对纯音、和声和言语的前注意皮层诱发反应:音乐训练的影响。

Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.

作者信息

Nikjeh Dee A, Lister Jennifer J, Frisch Stefan A

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):432-46. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bf2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cortical auditory evoked potentials, including mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a to pure tones, harmonic complexes, and speech syllables, were examined across groups of trained musicians and nonmusicians. Because of the extensive formal and informal auditory training received by musicians throughout their lifespan, it was predicted that these electrophysiological indicators of preattentive pitch discrimination and involuntary attention change would distinguish musicians from nonmusicians and provide insight regarding the influence of auditory training and experience on central auditory function.

DESIGN

A total of 102 (67 trained musicians, 35 nonmusicians) right-handed young women with normal hearing participated in three auditory stimulus conditions: pure tones (25 musicians/15 nonmusicians), harmonic tones (42 musicians/20 nonmusicians), and speech syllables (26 musicians/15 nonmusicians). Pure tone and harmonic tone stimuli were presented in multideviant oddball paradigms designed to elicit MMN and P3a. Each paradigm included one standard and two infrequently occurring deviants. For the pure tone condition, the standard pure tone was 1000 Hz, and the two deviant tones differed in frequency from the standard by either 1.5% (1015 Hz) or 6% (1060 Hz). The harmonic tone complexes were digitally created and contained a fundamental frequency (F0) and three harmonics. The amplitude of each harmonic was divided by its harmonic number to create a natural amplitude contour in the frequency spectrum. The standard tone was G4 (F0 = 392 Hz), and the two deviant tones differed in fundamental frequency from the standard by 1.5% (F0 = 386 Hz) or 6% (F0 = 370 Hz). The fundamental frequencies of the harmonic tones occur within the average female vocal range. The third condition to elicit MMN and P3a was designed for the presentation of speech syllables (/ba/ and /da/) and was structured as a traditional oddball paradigm (one standard/one infrequent deviant). Each speech stimulus was presented as a standard and a deviant in separate blocks. P1-N1-P2 was elicited before each oddball task by presenting each auditory stimulus alone in single blocks. All cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded in a passive listening condition.

RESULTS

Incidental findings revealed that musicians had longer P1 latencies for pure tones and smaller P1 amplitudes for harmonic tones than nonmusicians. There were no P1 group differences for speech stimuli. Musicians compared with nonmusicians had shorter MMN latencies for all deviances (harmonic tones, pure tones, and speech). Musicians had shorter P3a latencies to harmonic tones and speech but not to pure tones. MMN and P3a amplitude were modulated by deviant frequency but not by group membership.

CONCLUSIONS

Formally trained musicians compared with nonmusicians showed more efficient neural detection of pure tones and harmonic tones; demonstrated superior auditory sensory-memory traces for acoustic features of pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech; and revealed enhanced sensitivity to acoustic changes of spectrally rich stimuli (i.e., harmonic tones and speech). Findings support a general influence of music training on central auditory function and illustrate experience-facilitated modulation of the auditory neural system.

摘要

目的

对经过训练的音乐家组和非音乐家组进行检测,观察其对纯音、和声复合音及语音音节的皮质听觉诱发电位,包括失匹配负波(MMN)和P3a。鉴于音乐家在其整个职业生涯中接受了广泛的正式和非正式听觉训练,预计这些用于前注意音调辨别和非自愿注意变化的电生理指标能够区分音乐家和非音乐家,并深入了解听觉训练和经验对中枢听觉功能的影响。

设计

共有102名听力正常的右利手年轻女性(67名经过训练的音乐家,35名非音乐家)参与了三种听觉刺激条件的测试:纯音(25名音乐家/15名非音乐家)、和声复合音(42名音乐家/20名非音乐家)和语音音节(26名音乐家/15名非音乐家)。纯音和和声复合音刺激采用多偏差的oddball范式呈现,以诱发MMN和P3a。每个范式包括一个标准刺激和两个不常出现的偏差刺激。对于纯音条件,标准纯音为1000 Hz,两个偏差纯音的频率与标准频率相差1.5%(1015 Hz)或6%(1060 Hz)。和声复合音是通过数字方式生成的,包含一个基频(F0)和三个谐波。每个谐波的幅度除以其谐波次数,以在频谱中创建自然幅度轮廓。标准音为G4(F0 = 392 Hz),两个偏差音的基频与标准频率相差1.5%(F0 = 386 Hz)或6%(F0 = 370 Hz)。和声复合音的基频出现在女性平均音域范围内。诱发MMN和P3a的第三种条件是用于呈现语音音节(/ba/和/da/),并构建为传统的oddball范式(一个标准刺激/一个不常出现的偏差刺激)。每个语音刺激在单独的组块中分别呈现为标准刺激和偏差刺激。在每个oddball任务之前,通过在单个组块中单独呈现每个听觉刺激来诱发P1 - N1 - P2。所有皮质听觉诱发电位均在被动聆听条件下记录。

结果

偶然发现,与非音乐家相比,音乐家对纯音的P1潜伏期更长,对和声复合音的P1波幅更小。对于语音刺激,两组之间在P1上没有差异。与非音乐家相比,音乐家对所有偏差刺激(和声复合音、纯音和语音)的MMN潜伏期更短。音乐家对和声复合音和语音的P3a潜伏期更短,但对纯音则不然。MMN和P3a的波幅受偏差频率调制,但不受组别影响。

结论

与非音乐家相比,经过正式训练的音乐家对纯音和和声复合音的神经检测效率更高;在纯音、和声复合音和语音的声学特征方面表现出更优的听觉感觉记忆痕迹;并且对频谱丰富的刺激(即和声复合音和语音)的声学变化表现出更高的敏感性。研究结果支持音乐训练对中枢听觉功能的普遍影响,并说明了经验对听觉神经系统的促进性调节作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验