• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Relationship between intensity and relief in patients with acute severe pain.

作者信息

Bernstein Steven L, Bijur Polly E, Gallagher E John

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.007
PMID:16490644
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test whether a single-category improvement on a Likert pain relief scale equals the minimum clinically significant difference of 1.3 units in pain intensity reduction on a 10-unit numerical rating scale (NRS).

METHODS

Prospective cohort of adults with acute severe pain receiving standardized analgesia. Patients rated pain intensity via NRS before receiving morphine and 30 minutes later. Patients described pain relief as "none," "a little," "moderate," "a lot," or "complete." The primary outcome was the difference in NRS scores between each contiguous pair of pain relief categories over 30 minutes.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients, age range 21 to 65 years, median baseline NRS pain score 10 (interquartile range, 9-10). Patients whose relief was "complete," "a lot," "moderate," "mild," and "none" had the following NRS unit reductions in pain, respectively: 9, 5.7, 3.9, 2.1, and -0.1. The difference between each pair of relief categories was 3.3, 1.8, 1.8, and 2.2 units.

CONCLUSION

Each single-category improvement on a pain relief scale exceeds the minimum clinically significant difference in pain intensity as measured on an NRS.

摘要

相似文献

1
Relationship between intensity and relief in patients with acute severe pain.
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.007.
2
Efficacy and safety profile of a single dose of hydromorphone compared with morphine in older adults with acute, severe pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.单剂量氢吗啡酮与吗啡用于急性重度疼痛老年患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.02.002.
3
Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain? A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses.对于严重急性疼痛的院前治疗,是否存在理想的吗啡剂量?两种剂量的随机双盲比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.020.
4
The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil versus morphine anesthesia after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后静脉自控瑞芬太尼与吗啡麻醉的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):170-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
5
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain.在急诊科中、重度急性疼痛患者中进行的两种静脉注射吗啡剂量(0.10mg/kg和0.15mg/kg)的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;49(4):445-53, 453.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.030. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
6
Codeine/acetaminophen and hydrocodone/acetaminophen combination tablets for the management of chronic cancer pain in adults: a 23-day, prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.可待因/对乙酰氨基酚和氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂用于成人慢性癌痛的管理:一项为期23天的前瞻性、双盲、随机、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):581-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.004.
7
Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.芬太尼口腔崩解片用于缓解阿片类药物耐受的成年慢性神经性疼痛患者的爆发性疼痛:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):588-601. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.007.
8
Identifying the minimum clinically significant difference in acute pain in the elderly.确定老年人急性疼痛的最小临床差异。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):517-521.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
9
A randomized controlled trial comparing a fascia iliaca compartment nerve block to a traditional systemic analgesic for femur fractures in a pediatric emergency department.一项在儿科急诊科进行的随机对照试验,比较髂筋膜间隙神经阻滞与传统全身镇痛药用于股骨骨折的效果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;50(2):162-71, 171.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
10
Analgesic efficacy and safety of morphine-chitosan nasal solution in patients with moderate to severe pain following orthopedic surgery.吗啡-壳聚糖鼻用溶液对骨科手术后中重度疼痛患者的镇痛疗效及安全性
Pain Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;9(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00300.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus paracetamol-caffeine for pain control during overall orthodontic treatment.一项关于低强度激光疗法与对乙酰氨基酚-咖啡因在正畸治疗全过程中控制疼痛效果的随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 22;15(1):30839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16658-2.
2
Epidural analgesia versus oral morphine for postoperative pain management following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomised, controlled, double-blind trial.硬膜外镇痛与口服吗啡用于电视辅助胸腔手术后的术后疼痛管理:一项随机、对照、双盲试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Jan 1;41(1):61-69. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001921. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
3
Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction.
德尔福共识:急性髂股静脉血栓形成和慢性髂股静脉阻塞的血管内治疗的临床研究报告标准。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul;16(7):e012894. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012894. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Angiojet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulant therapy alone in massive cancer-associated thrombosis: a single centre retrospective cohort study.Angiojet 机械血栓切除联合抗凝治疗与单纯抗凝治疗在巨大癌症相关性血栓中的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Feb;55(2):365-375. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02770-5. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Venous Thrombolysis Strategy that Included Rheolytic Thrombectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中包含旋切血栓切除术的药物机械性导管直接溶栓策略的临床转归。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1296-1309.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中接受药物机械溶栓治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者术后残余血栓与临床结局的相关性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1517-1528.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性髂股静脉血栓形成的血管内血栓切除术。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 26;139(9):1162-1173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037425.
8
Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial.不同剂量经皮神经刺激用于分娩时镇痛的评估:一项随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Nov 26;19(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2.
9
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗深静脉血栓形成
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2240-2252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615066.
10
Inhaled steroids reduce pain and sVCAM levels in individuals with sickle cell disease: A triple-blind, randomized trial.吸入性类固醇可降低镰状细胞病患者的疼痛和可溶性血管细胞黏附分子水平:一项三盲随机试验。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Jul;92(7):622-631. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24742. Epub 2017 Jun 5.