• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1992年至2002年间急诊科撕裂伤的全国趋势。

National trends in ED lacerations between 1992 and 2002.

作者信息

Singer Adam J, Thode Henry C, Hollander Judd E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, NY 11794-8350, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.021.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.021
PMID:16490648
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National estimates of the number of lacerations are based on the number of wounds cared for in the emergency department (ED). However, this number includes wounds other than lacerations. We estimated the number and characteristics of lacerations treated in the United States between 1992 and 2002.

METHODS

The design used was secondary analysis of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (a weighted sample of ED encounters). Encounters with a laceration recorded as 1 of the 3 diagnosis codes (870-897) of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification for the visit were included. Data collection included demographics, wound location, insurance status, procedures performed, type of practitioner, and pain severity. For data analysis, the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey databases for 1992 to 2002 were downloaded from its Web site and imported into SPSS 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) for analysis. National estimates were obtained using assigned patient visit weights. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and group comparisons were performed with chi(2) tests using unweighted data. Rates were calculated using population data from the US census.

RESULTS

There were 300715 patient encounters sampled from nearly 400 EDs resulting in an estimated 1.08 billion ED visits between 1992 and 2002. In the sample, 24755 patients (8.2%) had lacerations resulting in an estimated 90 million lacerations. Although the number of total ED visits increased annually during the study period (from 89.8 to 110.15 million), the number of lacerations declined (from 9.35 to 7.27 million). Lacerations were distributed on the upper extremity (35%), face (28%), trunk (14.5%), lower extremity (12.5%), and head and neck (10%). In 2002, about two thirds of the patients with a laceration were men, one third were children, and more than three fourths were white. Facial lacerations were more common in children (43% vs 20%; P < .01), whereas upper extremity lacerations were more common in adults (48% vs 20%, P < .001). The number of visits for lacerations was greatest on weekends, during the spring and summer, and between noon and 10 pm. Work-related injuries accounted for 11% of lacerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in the total number of ED visits over the last decade, the number of lacerations has declined, as is less than previously estimated.

摘要

目的

全国范围内对撕裂伤数量的估计是基于急诊科(ED)所处理伤口的数量。然而,这个数字包含了除撕裂伤之外的其他伤口。我们估算了1992年至2002年间美国治疗的撕裂伤的数量及特征。

方法

采用的设计是对国家医院门诊医疗调查(急诊科就诊情况的加权样本)进行二次分析。将就诊时记录为国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本中3个诊断编码(870 - 897)之一的撕裂伤病例纳入。数据收集包括人口统计学信息、伤口位置、保险状况、所实施的操作、从业者类型以及疼痛严重程度。为进行数据分析,从其网站下载了1992年至2002年的国家医院门诊医疗调查数据库,并导入SPSS 12.0(SPSS,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行分析。使用指定的患者就诊权重获得全国估计值。计算描述性统计量,并使用未加权数据通过卡方检验进行组间比较。发病率使用美国人口普查的人口数据计算。

结果

从近400个急诊科抽取了300715例患者就诊病例,由此估计1992年至2002年间急诊科就诊人次达10.8亿。在样本中,24755名患者(8.2%)有撕裂伤,由此估计有9000万例撕裂伤。尽管在研究期间急诊科就诊总人次逐年增加(从8980万增至1.1015亿),但撕裂伤数量却有所下降(从935万降至727万)。撕裂伤分布在上肢(35%)、面部(28%)、躯干(14.5%)、下肢(12.5%)以及头颈部(10%)。2002年,约三分之二的撕裂伤患者为男性,三分之一为儿童,超过四分之三为白人。面部撕裂伤在儿童中更为常见(43%对20%;P < 0.01),而上肢撕裂伤在成年人中更为常见(48%对20%,P < 0.001)。撕裂伤就诊人次在周末、春季和夏季以及中午至晚上10点之间最多。工伤导致的撕裂伤占11%。

结论

尽管在过去十年中急诊科就诊总人次有所增加,但撕裂伤数量却有所下降,且低于先前估计。

相似文献

1
National trends in ED lacerations between 1992 and 2002.1992年至2002年间急诊科撕裂伤的全国趋势。
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.021.
2
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1999年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2001 Jun 25(320):1-34.
3
Dental complaints in emergency departments: a national perspective.急诊科的牙科投诉:全国视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;42(1):93-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.234.
4
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 Emergency Department Summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:1992年急诊科总结
Vital Health Stat 13. 1997 Mar(125):1-108.
5
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
6
Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources.美国的急诊护理:国家数据源简介。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;56(2):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
7
Characteristics of ice hockey-related injuries treated in US emergency departments, 2001-2002.2001 - 2002年美国急诊科治疗的与冰球相关损伤的特征。
Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):e661-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1565.
8
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2002年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2004 Mar 18(340):1-34.
9
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
10
Epidemiology and characteristics of emergency departments visits by US adults with psychiatric disorder and antipsychotic mention from 2000 to 2004.2000年至2004年美国患有精神疾病并提及使用抗精神病药物的成年人急诊科就诊情况的流行病学及特征
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1185/030079907X187900.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and predictors of nonresponse to intranasal midazolam in children undergoing laceration repair.接受裂伤修复术的儿童对鼻内咪达唑仑无反应的发生率及预测因素
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;32(7):768-775. doi: 10.1111/acem.15106. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Incidence and Characterization of Facial Lacerations in Emergency Departments in the United States.美国急诊科面部撕裂伤的发病率及特征
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP113-NP120. doi: 10.1177/19433875241257572. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Neurovascular Grafting in Complex Upper Extremity Trauma: A Case Series Report.
复杂上肢创伤中的神经血管移植:病例系列报告
Cureus. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):e69467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69467. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Guardian-Perceived Cosmetic Outcome of Simple Lacerations Repaired With Either Dermabond, Steri-Strips, or Absorbable Sutures.一种随机对照研究,比较了 Dermabond、Steri-Strips 和可吸收缝线修复简单裂伤后,由监护人感知的美容效果。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):700-704. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003244. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Enhancing emergency department charting: Using Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) to identify laceration repairs.加强急诊科病历记录:使用生成式预训练变换器4(GPT-4)识别撕裂伤修复情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;32(1):94-97. doi: 10.1111/acem.14995. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Presentations and management of hospitalized patients with upper extremity fractures at a level 1 trauma center: a 5-year observational study.一家 1 级创伤中心住院上肢骨折患者的表现和处理:一项 5 年观察性研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3035-3043. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04017-2. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Paediatric laceration repair in the emergency department: post-discharge pain and maladaptive behavioural changes.儿科急诊外伤修复:出院后疼痛和适应不良的行为改变。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):469-474. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213858.
8
Is the use of specific time cut-off or "golden period" for primary closure of acute traumatic wounds evidence based? A systematic review.急性创伤性伤口一期缝合时使用特定的时间截点或“黄金时间”是否有循证医学证据?一项系统评价。
Croat Med J. 2021 Dec 31;62(6):614-622. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.614.
9
A Thai version of the Michigan hand questionnaire (Thai MHQ): an investigation of the psychometric properties.泰国版密歇根手问卷(Thai MHQ):心理测量学特性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01548-0.
10
Updates in emergency department laceration management.急诊科伤口处理的最新进展。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;6(2):97-105. doi: 10.15441/ceem.18.018. Epub 2019 Apr 8.