Snyder Samuel K, Roberson Charles R, Cummings Carol C, Rajab Mohammad H
Department of Surgery, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine, Scott & White Clinic and Foundation, Temple, Tex 76508, USA.
Arch Surg. 2006 Feb;141(2):167-73. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.2.167.
Early in the 20th century, thyroid surgery was performed using local anesthetic techniques. When general anesthesia became safer, surgeons started performing thyroidectomy exclusively under general anesthesia. However, recent descriptions of thyroidectomy under local anesthesia claim similar results to thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. Surgery conducted under local anesthesia can result in early discharge, ie, a hospital stay of less than 8 hours.
Thyroidectomy can be performed under local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with results similar to general anesthesia in an outpatient or inpatient surgery setting.
A prospective randomized study comparing local anesthesia with MAC vs general anesthesia in adult patients undergoing thyroidectomy in a potential outpatient setting, defined as same-day discharge. Patients were excluded if they were not able to receive local or general anesthesia. In addition, we performed an outcome evaluation of the use of local anesthesia with MAC for thyroidectomy and the use of outpatient surgery for thyroidectomy. We compared 58 consecutive thyroidectomies performed prior to the study with 58 consecutive thyroidectomies performed after the study.
A 486-bed university-affiliated hospital.
Fifty-eight patients undergoing thyroidectomy received random assignment: 29 to local anesthesia with MAC and 29 to general anesthesia under study protocol. Fifty-one surgical procedures (88%) were completed as outpatient surgery. No significant differences were found between the 2 study groups in demographics, postoperative adverse symptoms, complications, hospital admission, or patient satisfaction. Patients in the general anesthesia group spent, on average, more time postoperatively than patients in the group that received local anesthesia with MAC in the outpatient surgery center until same-day discharge (P = .02). When compared before the study, we found a significant increase after the randomized study in the use of local anesthesia with MAC (P<.001) and outpatient thyroidectomies (P<.001).
Thyroidectomy can be performed in the studied patient population under either general anesthesia or local anesthesia with MAC, expecting similar operative results, clinical results, and patient satisfaction. In addition, local anesthesia with MAC can reduce the postoperative time spent in an outpatient surgery setting with potential health care cost savings.
20世纪初,甲状腺手术采用局部麻醉技术进行。当全身麻醉变得更安全时,外科医生开始仅在全身麻醉下进行甲状腺切除术。然而,最近关于局部麻醉下甲状腺切除术的描述称其结果与全身麻醉下的甲状腺切除术相似。局部麻醉下进行的手术可实现早期出院,即住院时间少于8小时。
在门诊或住院手术环境中,甲状腺切除术可在局部麻醉联合监护下麻醉(MAC)下进行,其结果与全身麻醉相似。
一项前瞻性随机研究,比较在潜在门诊环境(定义为当日出院)中接受甲状腺切除术的成年患者局部麻醉联合MAC与全身麻醉的效果。如果患者无法接受局部或全身麻醉,则将其排除。此外,我们对局部麻醉联合MAC用于甲状腺切除术以及门诊手术用于甲状腺切除术的结果进行了评估。我们将研究前连续进行的58例甲状腺切除术与研究后连续进行的58例甲状腺切除术进行了比较。
一家拥有486张床位的大学附属医院。
58例接受甲状腺切除术的患者被随机分组:29例接受局部麻醉联合MAC,29例接受研究方案中的全身麻醉。51例手术(88%)作为门诊手术完成。在人口统计学、术后不良症状、并发症、住院情况或患者满意度方面,两个研究组之间未发现显著差异。在门诊手术中心,全身麻醉组患者术后平均花费的时间比接受局部麻醉联合MAC组的患者直到当日出院时花费的时间更长(P = 0.02)。与研究前相比,我们发现随机研究后局部麻醉联合MAC的使用(P<0.001)和门诊甲状腺切除术的使用(P<0.001)有显著增加。
在所研究的患者群体中,甲状腺切除术可在全身麻醉或局部麻醉联合MAC下进行,预期手术结果、临床结果和患者满意度相似。此外,局部麻醉联合MAC可减少在门诊手术环境中花费的术后时间,可能节省医疗保健成本。