Wong Cynthia A, Ratliff John T, Sullivan John T, Scavone Barbara M, Toledo Paloma, McCarthy Robert J
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ilinois, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):904-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.
Bolus injection through an epidural catheter may result in better distribution of anesthetic solution in the epidural space compared with continuous infusion of the same anesthetic solution. In this randomized, double-blind study we compared total bupivacaine consumption, need for supplemental epidural analgesia, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction in women who received programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) compared with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) for maintenance of labor analgesia. The primary outcome variable was bupivacaine consumption per hour of analgesia. Combined spinal epidural analgesia was initiated in multiparas scheduled for induction of labor with cervical dilation between 2 and 5 cm. Subjects were randomized to PIEB (6-mL bolus every 30 min beginning 45 min after the intrathecal injection) or CEI (12-mL/h infusion beginning 15 min the after the intrathecal injection). The epidural analgesia solution was bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL and fentanyl 2 microg/mL. Breakthrough pain in both groups was treated initially with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) followed by manual bolus rescue analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125%. The median total bupivacaine dose per hour of analgesia was less in the PIEB (n = 63) (10.5 mg/h; 95% confidence interval, 9.5-11.8 mg/h) compared with the CEI group (n = 63) (12.3 mg/h; 95% confidence interval, 10.5-14.0 mg/h) (P < 0.01), fewer manual rescue boluses were required (rate difference 22%, 95% confidence interval of difference 5% to 38%), and satisfaction scores were higher. Labor pain, PCEA requests, and delivered PCEA doses did not differ. PIEB combined with PCEA provided similar analgesia, but with a smaller bupivacaine dose and better patient satisfaction compared with CEI with PCEA for maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.
与持续输注相同的麻醉溶液相比,通过硬膜外导管进行大剂量注射可能会使麻醉溶液在硬膜外腔中的分布更好。在这项随机双盲研究中,我们比较了接受程序化间歇性硬膜外推注(PIEB)与持续硬膜外输注(CEI)以维持分娩镇痛的女性中布比卡因的总消耗量、补充硬膜外镇痛的需求、镇痛质量和患者满意度。主要结局变量是每小时镇痛的布比卡因消耗量。对计划在宫颈扩张2至5厘米时引产的经产妇实施联合脊髓硬膜外镇痛。受试者被随机分为PIEB组(鞘内注射后45分钟开始,每30分钟推注6毫升)或CEI组(鞘内注射后15分钟开始,以12毫升/小时的速度输注)。硬膜外镇痛溶液为0.625毫克/毫升的布比卡因和2微克/毫升的芬太尼。两组的突破性疼痛最初均采用患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)治疗,随后使用0.125%的布比卡因进行手动推注补救镇痛。与CEI组(n = 63)(12.3毫克/小时;95%置信区间,10.5 - 14.0毫克/小时)相比,PIEB组(n = 63)每小时镇痛的布比卡因总剂量中位数更低(10.5毫克/小时;95%置信区间,9.5 - 11.8毫克/小时)(P < 0.01),所需的手动补救推注更少(率差22%,差值的95%置信区间为5%至38%),且满意度评分更高。分娩疼痛、PCEA请求和给予的PCEA剂量没有差异。与CEI联合PCEA用于维持硬膜外分娩镇痛相比,PIEB联合PCEA提供了相似的镇痛效果,但布比卡因剂量更小且患者满意度更高。