Desai Rutvik, Conant Lisa L, Waldron Eric, Binder Jeffrey R
Dept. of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Feb;18(2):278-97. doi: 10.1162/089892906775783633.
The generation of regular and irregular past tense verbs has been an important issue in cognitive science and has been used to advance different models of the organization of language in the brain. The dual-system view holds that the regular past tense forms are generated by a rule while irregular forms are retrieved from memory. The single-system view, on the other hand, holds that both forms are generated by a single integrated system and differ only in their reliance on factors such as phonology and semantics. We conducted an event-related fMRI study to examine the activation patterns associated with the generation and reading of regular and irregular past tense forms, in addition to the reading of their stems. Regular and irregular past tense generation activated similar brain regions compared to the reading of their respective stems. The areas activated more for irregular generation compared to regular generation included inferior frontal, precentral, and parietal regions bilaterally. This activation can be interpreted as reflecting the greater attentional and response selection demands of irregular generation. Compared to irregular generation, regular generation activated a small region in the left superior temporal gyrus when the regular and irregular past tense forms were mismatched on phonological complexity. No areas were more activated for regulars than irregulars when the past tense forms were matched on this variable. This suggests that the activation specific to regulars was related to the higher phonological complexity of their past tense forms rather than to their generation. A contrast of the reading of regular and irregular past tense forms was consistent with this hypothesis. These results support a single-system account of past tense generation.
规则和不规则过去式动词的生成一直是认知科学中的一个重要问题,并被用于推进大脑中语言组织的不同模型。双系统观点认为,规则过去式形式是由规则生成的,而不规则形式是从记忆中检索出来的。另一方面,单系统观点认为,这两种形式都是由一个单一的综合系统生成的,只是在对语音和语义等因素的依赖程度上有所不同。我们进行了一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究,以检查与规则和不规则过去式形式的生成及阅读相关的激活模式,以及它们词干的阅读情况。与各自词干的阅读相比,规则和不规则过去式的生成激活了相似的脑区。与规则生成相比,不规则生成时双侧激活更多的区域包括额下回、中央前回和顶叶区域。这种激活可以解释为反映了不规则生成对注意力和反应选择的更高要求。当规则和不规则过去式形式在语音复杂性上不匹配时,与不规则生成相比,规则生成激活了左颞上回的一个小区域。当过去式形式在这个变量上匹配时,没有区域在规则形式上比不规则形式激活更强。这表明规则形式特有的激活与它们过去式形式更高的语音复杂性有关,而不是与它们的生成有关。规则和不规则过去式形式阅读的对比与这个假设一致。这些结果支持了过去式生成的单系统观点。