Suppr超能文献

单操作者与双操作者超声引导下颈内静脉中心静脉置管的随机对照试验

Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation.

作者信息

Milling Truman, Holden Carlos, Melniker Lawrence, Briggs William M, Birkhahn Robert, Gaeta Theodore

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):245-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.004. Epub 2006 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Use of ultrasound guidance for central line placement generally requires two operators: one to hold the transducer and the other to guide the needle. The authors propose a single-operator technique and compare it with the two-operator technique for placement of internal jugular central lines.

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial conducted from June to September 2004 in a U.S. urban teaching hospital. Enrollment packets were randomized to dynamic single operator (D1) and dynamic two operator (D2). The procedure was performed under ultrasound visualization in the transverse plane. The primary outcome measure was cannulation success. A complete Bayesian analysis using noninformative priors to estimate the probability of similarity of outcomes for D1 and D2 was performed. All variables are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) where appropriate.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled from the emergency department and intensive care unit. Twenty-three patients were randomized to D1, and 21 to D2. Cannulation success was 96% (95% CI = 85% to 100%) for D1 and 95% (95% CI = 83% to 100%) for D2. There was a 90% probability that the success rates of these two groups differed by less than 10% of each other.

CONCLUSIONS

This one-person technique appears to be equivalent to the standard two-person technique for successful ultrasound-guided internal jugular central venous catheterization with respect to overall success.

摘要

目的

使用超声引导进行中心静脉置管通常需要两名操作人员:一人手持探头,另一人引导穿刺针。作者提出了一种单人操作技术,并将其与两人操作技术用于颈内静脉中心静脉置管进行比较。

方法

这是一项于2004年6月至9月在美国一家城市教学医院进行的随机临床试验。将入组资料随机分为动态单人操作组(D1)和动态双人操作组(D2)。操作在超声横向平面可视化下进行。主要结局指标是置管成功。使用非信息先验进行了完整的贝叶斯分析,以估计D1和D2结局相似性的概率。所有变量在适当情况下均报告95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

44例患者来自急诊科和重症监护病房。23例患者随机分为D1组,21例分为D2组。D1组置管成功率为96%(95%CI=85%至100%),D2组为95%(95%CI=83%至100%)。这两组成功率相差小于彼此的10%的概率为90%。

结论

就总体成功率而言,这种单人操作技术似乎与标准的两人操作技术在超声引导下成功进行颈内静脉中心静脉置管方面相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验