Farah Andrew
High Point Regional Health Systems, High Point, NC 27262, USA.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;7(6):268-74. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v07n0602.
To review the current definition of atypicality, discuss the unique features of each atypical antipsychotic, and determine whether the available drugs in this class really meet the classical definition of atypicality.
A PubMed search was conducted to identify literature on the subject of this review, supported by additional articles based on the author's clinical knowledge and experience.
Relevant references were extracted and summarized in order to meet the objective of the article.
Atypical antipsychotics are considered a major advance over conventional antipsychotics, primarily because they offer effective treatment alternatives that are relatively free of extrapyramidal symptoms. In fact, the term atypicality was originally used to describe antipsychotic agents with a minimal risk of causing extrapyramidal symptoms. However, over the years the definition has been modified such that there is currently no consensus on a true definition of atypicality for these agents. Each of the atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) commercially available in the United States is unique in terms of its pharmacologic profile, differing with respect to receptor-binding affinity, mechanism of action, and adverse events. Of the available atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and quetiapine have shown the lowest propensity to cause extrapyramidal symptoms. Although the risk of extra-pyramidal symptoms is lower with risperidone and olanzapine than with conventional antipsychotics, risk increases with dose escalation. Data for ziprasidone indicate that the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms may be similar to that of risperidone and olanzapine. There is a concern of akathisia with aripiprazole; however, more experience with this agent is needed before definitive conclusions are made.
If the definition of "atypical" antipsychotic is considered to be freedom from extrapyramidal symptoms, then, based on a comprehensive review of available data and clinical experience, clozapine and quetiapine appear to be the only true atypicals.
回顾当前非典型性的定义,讨论每种非典型抗精神病药物的独特特征,并确定该类现有药物是否真的符合非典型性的经典定义。
进行了PubMed检索以识别关于本综述主题的文献,并辅以基于作者临床知识和经验的其他文章。
提取并总结相关参考文献以实现本文的目的。
非典型抗精神病药物被认为是相对于传统抗精神病药物的一项重大进展,主要是因为它们提供了相对没有锥体外系症状的有效治疗选择。事实上,“非典型性”一词最初用于描述引起锥体外系症状风险最小的抗精神病药物。然而,多年来该定义已被修改,以至于目前对于这些药物的非典型性的真正定义尚无共识。在美国可获得的每种非典型抗精神病药物(氯氮平、利培酮、奥氮平、喹硫平、齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑)在药理学特征方面都是独特的,在受体结合亲和力、作用机制和不良事件方面存在差异。在可用的非典型抗精神病药物中,氯氮平和喹硫平引起锥体外系症状的倾向最低。虽然利培酮和奥氮平引起锥体外系症状的风险低于传统抗精神病药物,但风险会随着剂量增加而增加。齐拉西酮的数据表明,锥体外系症状的风险可能与利培酮和奥氮平相似。人们担心阿立哌唑会引起静坐不能;然而,在得出明确结论之前还需要对该药物有更多经验。
如果将“非典型”抗精神病药物的定义视为没有锥体外系症状,那么,基于对现有数据和临床经验的全面综述,氯氮平和喹硫平似乎是仅有的真正非典型药物。