Landon Bruce E, Reschovsky James D, Pham Hoangmai H, Blumenthal David
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Med Care. 2006 Mar;44(3):234-42. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000199848.17133.9b.
During the past decade, a confluence of forces has changed the practice of medicine in unprecedented ways. Anecdotal reports suggest that, in response, some physicians are leaving the practice of medicine or retiring earlier than they otherwise would have.
We sought to examine how physician demographic characteristics, practice characteristics, and career satisfaction are related to physician decisions to leave the practice of medicine or substantially cut back their practice hours.
Data for this study are from the first 2 rounds of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey, a series of nationally representative telephone surveys of physicians first conducted in 1996. Subsequent rounds of the survey included physicians sampled in the previous round, which allowed us to ascertain their career status 2 years after their initial interviews.
Primary care and specialist physicians initially spending at least 20 hours per week in direct patient care activities were studied.
Physicians cutting back their practice hours to less than 20 hours per week or leaving the practice of medicine altogether.
Of the 16,681 physicians interviewed for whom we also had information about their career status 2 years later, 462 (2.8%) had retired and 499 (3.0%) had reduced time spent in patient care to less than 20 hours per week. In multinomial logistic analyses that examined both outcomes, full- or part-owners of practices were both less likely to retire and to cut back hours. Internal medicine specialists and psychiatrists were less likely to retire (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.99 and OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.60 respectively) whereas surgical specialists were more likely to retire (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). Physician satisfaction was strongly related to both outcomes. For instance, very dissatisfied physicians were both more likely to retire (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.6-3.5) and cut back on their hours (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.32-5.6).
Our findings demonstrate that dissatisfied physicians were 2 to 3 times more likely to leave medicine than satisfied physicians. These findings have implications for physician manpower projections and quality of care.
在过去十年中,多种力量汇聚,以前所未有的方式改变了医疗实践。轶事报道表明,作为回应,一些医生正离开医疗行业或比原本计划更早退休。
我们试图研究医生的人口统计学特征、执业特征和职业满意度如何与医生离开医疗行业或大幅减少执业时间的决定相关。
本研究的数据来自社区追踪研究(CTS)医生调查的前两轮,这是一系列始于1996年的对医生进行的具有全国代表性的电话调查。后续轮次的调查包括对上一轮抽样的医生进行回访,这使我们能够确定他们在初次访谈两年后的职业状况。
研究最初每周至少花费20小时进行直接患者护理活动的初级保健医生和专科医生。
医生将执业时间减少到每周少于20小时或完全离开医疗行业。
在我们还掌握其两年后职业状况信息的16681名受访医生中,462人(2.8%)已退休,499人(3.0%)将用于患者护理的时间减少到每周少于20小时。在对这两种结果进行检验的多项逻辑分析中,诊所的全职或部分所有者退休和减少工作时间的可能性都较小。内科专科医生和精神科医生退休的可能性较小(优势比[OR]分别为0.69,95%置信区间[CI]为0.48 - 0.99和OR 0.33,95% CI为0.18 - 0.60),而外科专科医生退休的可能性较大(OR 1.6,95% CI为1.1 - 2.2)。医生满意度与这两种结果都密切相关。例如,非常不满意的医生退休(OR 2.34,95% CI为1.6 - 3.5)和减少工作时间(OR 3.6,95% CI为2.32 - 5.6)的可能性都更大。
我们的研究结果表明,不满意的医生离开医疗行业的可能性是满意医生的2至3倍。这些发现对医生人力预测和医疗质量具有启示意义。