• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高住院医师查房效率的偏好:一项调查分析。

Preferences to improve rounding efficiency amongst hospitalists: a survey analysis.

作者信息

Mirabella Angela C, McAmis Nicole E, Kiassat Corey, Feinn Richard, Singh Gagan

机构信息

Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA.

School of Engineering, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Jun 21;11(4):501-506. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1929047.

DOI:10.1080/20009666.2021.1929047
PMID:34211657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8221154/
Abstract

: There is no 'gold standard' method of rounding for hospitalists. This study investigates hospitalist rounding preferences to improve efficiency based on resources categorized under work assignment and communication. : An anonymous survey containing demographics and questions on preferences for rounding efficiently by hospitalists were widely distributed online. Res6ponses were presented using descriptive statistics and SPSS v26. : There were 143 respondents, majority male (60%) with (40%) female. Most (80%) expect higher patient volumes when working with an advanced practitioner (AP). Half (50%) preferred rounding independently, (34%) with an AP, and majority (62%) with a resident. Geographic rounding was most efficient at 85%. Text messaging for paging was preferred (70.1%) to pagers (23.4%). Respondents preferred calling a consultant (52%) or text messaging (40%). Majority have not used a WOW yet (74%) believe WOWs could improve efficiency. Majority prefer dictation via Dragon (47%) to the phone application (23%). Only 29% believe their EMR is too complex to navigate. Preference difference due to age was insignificant. : In this study, 143 hospitalists provided preferences for improving rounding efficiency based on elements from work assignment and communication. This analysis can provide insights on designing best practices for hospitalists rounding efficiently.

摘要

对于住院医师而言,没有“金标准”的查房方法。本研究调查住院医师的查房偏好,以便根据工作分配和沟通方面的资源来提高效率。

一项包含人口统计学信息以及关于住院医师高效查房偏好问题的匿名调查在网上广泛分发。使用描述性统计和SPSS v26软件呈现结果。

共有143名受访者,多数为男性(60%),女性占40%。大多数(80%)人预计在与高级执业医师(AP)合作时患者数量会增加。一半(50%)的人更喜欢独立查房,34%的人喜欢与AP一起查房,大多数(62%)的人喜欢与住院医师一起查房。区域查房效率最高,为85%。相比传呼机(23.4%),更多人更喜欢通过短信传呼(70.1%)。受访者更喜欢打电话给会诊医生(52%)或发短信(40%)。大多数人尚未使用过工作优化工具(WOW)(74%),但认为WOW可以提高效率。大多数人更喜欢通过Dragon进行听写(47%),而不是使用手机应用程序(23%)。只有29%的人认为他们的电子病历系统太难操作。年龄导致的偏好差异不显著。

在本研究中,143名住院医师基于工作分配和沟通要素提供了提高查房效率的偏好。该分析可为设计住院医师高效查房的最佳实践提供见解。

相似文献

1
Preferences to improve rounding efficiency amongst hospitalists: a survey analysis.提高住院医师查房效率的偏好:一项调查分析。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Jun 21;11(4):501-506. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1929047.
2
The effect of geographic rounding on hospitalist work experience: a mixed-methods study.地理轮调对医院医生工作经验的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2022 Apr;50(2):124-131. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2050649. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
TXT@WORK: pediatric hospitalists and text messaging.工作中的短信应用:儿科住院医师与短信交流
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Jul;20(7):647-52. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0200. Epub 2014 May 2.
4
Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction.城市教学医院住院医师的地理分配:可行性及其对效率和医疗服务提供者满意度的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Oct;45(4):135-142. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
Beyond Discharge Summaries: Communication Preferences in Care Transitions Between Hospitalists and Primary Care Providers Using Electronic Medical Records.出院小结之外:住院医师与初级保健提供者利用电子病历进行护理转接时的沟通偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1789-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05786-2. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Observing and Identifying Hospitalist Best Communication Practices in Patient Interactions.观察并识别住院医师在患者互动中的最佳沟通方式。
Hosp Top. 2019 Oct-Dec;97(4):156-164. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2019.1667284. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Hospitalist Perspective of Interactions with Medicine Subspecialty Consult Services.医院医师视角下的与医学亚专科会诊服务的互动。
J Hosp Med. 2018 May 1;13(5):318-323. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2882. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
A novel hospitalist peer observation program to improve educational and operational rounding practices.一种新颖的医院医师同行观察项目,旨在改善教育和操作性查房实践。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Mar;19(3):200-203. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13285. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
9
Resident Use of Text Messaging for Patient Care: Ease of Use or Breach of Privacy?居民使用短信进行患者护理:使用方便还是侵犯隐私?
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Nov 26;3(4):e37. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4797.
10
Assessment of Hospitalist-Subspecialist Agreement About Who Should Be in Charge and Comparison With Actual Assignment Practices.评估住院医师与专科医师关于谁应负责的意见一致性,并与实际分配做法进行比较。
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Aug;8(8):479-485. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0177.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Paradigm in Hospital Medicine: Evaluating the Effects of Geographical Cohorting on Health Care Delivery.医院医学的新范式:评估地理队列对医疗服务提供的影响。
HCA Healthc J Med. 2025 Feb 1;6(1):23-30. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1865. eCollection 2025.
2
Use of pager devices in New Zealand public hospitals as a critical communication tool: Barriers & way forward.新西兰公立医院将寻呼设备用作关键通信工具的情况:障碍与未来方向。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 26;9(8):e18717. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18717. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
A Time Motion Study Evaluating the Impact of Geographic Cohorting of Hospitalists.一项时间与动作研究评估了医院医师地理分组对……的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Jun;15(6):338-344. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3339.
2
Clinicians' perceptions of rounding processes and effectiveness of clinical communication.临床医生对查房流程的看法和临床沟通的有效性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):801-811. doi: 10.1111/jep.13248. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
An iron triangle ROI model for health care.一种用于医疗保健的铁三角投资回报率模型。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 May 10;11:335-348. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S130623. eCollection 2019.
4
The Impact of Resident Geographic Rounding on Rapid Responses.住院医师地理巡诊对快速反应的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1077-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05012-8.
5
Provider Adoption of Speech Recognition and its Impact on Satisfaction, Documentation Quality, Efficiency, and Cost in an Inpatient EHR.住院电子健康记录中医疗服务提供者对语音识别技术的采用及其对满意度、文档质量、效率和成本的影响
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:186-195. eCollection 2018.
6
Using voice to create hospital progress notes: Description of a mobile application and supporting system integrated with a commercial electronic health record.使用语音创建医院进度记录:描述一个与商业电子健康记录集成的移动应用程序和支持系统。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
7
Hospitalist Perspective of Interactions with Medicine Subspecialty Consult Services.医院医师视角下的与医学亚专科会诊服务的互动。
J Hosp Med. 2018 May 1;13(5):318-323. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2882. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Use of dictation as a tool to decrease documentation errors in electronic health records.使用听写作为减少电子健康记录中记录错误的工具。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Oct 18;7(5):282-286. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1379852. eCollection 2017.
9
Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction.城市教学医院住院医师的地理分配:可行性及其对效率和医疗服务提供者满意度的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Oct;45(4):135-142. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
Hospitalist workload: the search for the magic number.住院医师工作量:探寻神奇数字。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):794-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.18.