• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息性放射治疗中的决策:重新构建脑转移瘤患者及其照料者的希望

Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases.

作者信息

Sze Jacqueline, Marisette Stephen, Williams Diane, Nyhof-Young Joyce, Crooks Dauna, Husain Amna, Bezjak Andrea, Wong Rebecca K S

机构信息

Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 5th Floor, 610 University Avenue, M5G 2M9, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2006 Oct;14(10):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0032-y. Epub 2006 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-006-0032-y
PMID:16502003
Abstract

GOALS OF WORK

To explore the major factors important in decision making for whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases and their caregivers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two parallel qualitative studies, one for patients and one for caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, were conducted. Semistructured interviews were conducted and audiotaped with each participant. Content analysis and theme extraction of the transcripts were undertaken to identify recurring themes and relational patterns.

RESULTS

Twenty patients and 19 caregivers (including eight patient and caregiver pairs) were recruited into the study. Four major factors were identified to influence decision making of whole-brain radiation: hope, knowledge, expectations of radiation therapy, and current symptoms. Analysis reveals that patients generally focus on current informational needs, while caregivers want more information about the future (e.g., life expectancy and anticipated symptoms). Caregivers expressed frustration when unable to explore future needs because patients were unprepared to discuss prognostic issues. Participants expressed substantial relief when offered WBRT after the diagnosis, but WBRT is often considered the only available plan rather than an informed choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the importance of caregivers in the care of patients with brain metastases, fulfilling their unique informational needs appears to require more attention. The blurred boundary between hopes and expectations for WBRT creates unique challenges in joint treatment decision making for patients with brain metastases and their caregivers.

摘要

工作目标

探讨脑转移瘤患者及其照护者在全脑放疗(WBRT)决策中重要的主要因素。

患者与方法

开展了两项平行的定性研究,一项针对患者,另一项针对新诊断脑转移瘤患者的照护者。对每位参与者进行了半结构化访谈并录音。对访谈记录进行内容分析和主题提取,以识别反复出现的主题和关系模式。

结果

20例患者和19名照护者(包括8对患者与照护者)被纳入研究。确定了影响全脑放疗决策的四个主要因素:希望、知识、对放疗的期望以及当前症状。分析显示,患者通常关注当前的信息需求,而照护者希望获得更多关于未来的信息(如预期寿命和预期症状)。当因患者未准备好讨论预后问题而无法探讨未来需求时,照护者会感到沮丧。诊断后提供WBRT时,参与者表示极大的宽慰,但WBRT通常被视为唯一可行的方案,而非经过充分了解后的选择。

结论

鉴于照护者在脑转移瘤患者护理中的重要性,满足他们独特的信息需求似乎需要更多关注。对WBRT的希望和期望之间模糊的界限,给脑转移瘤患者及其照护者的联合治疗决策带来了独特的挑战。

相似文献

1
Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases.姑息性放射治疗中的决策:重新构建脑转移瘤患者及其照料者的希望
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Oct;14(10):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0032-y. Epub 2006 Feb 25.
2
What do patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer want from their treatment?非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者对治疗有何诉求?
Palliat Med. 2009 Oct;23(7):594-600. doi: 10.1177/0269216309105787. Epub 2009 May 14.
3
From whole brain to hospice: patterns of care in radiation oncology.从全脑治疗到临终关怀:放射肿瘤学中的护理模式。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;17(6):662-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0549. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with or without whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.立体定向放射治疗与或不与全脑放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的新诊断病例。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:49-56. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.GKS121071.
5
Fostering coping and nurturing hope when discussing the future with terminally ill cancer patients and their caregivers.在与晚期癌症患者及其护理人员讨论未来时培养应对能力并孕育希望。
Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1965-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21011.
6
Physician expectations of treatment outcomes for patients with brain metastases referred for whole brain radiotherapy.医生对接受全脑放疗的脑转移患者治疗效果的预期。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.035.
7
Prospective evaluation of the palliative effect of whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases and poor performance status.前瞻性评估伴身体状况不佳的脑转移瘤患者全脑放疗的姑息疗效。
Acta Oncol. 2010 Apr;49(3):382-8. doi: 10.3109/02841860903352942.
8
The needs of terminally ill cancer patients versus those of caregivers for information regarding prognosis and end-of-life issues.晚期癌症患者与护理人员对于预后及临终问题信息的需求对比。
Cancer. 2005 May 1;103(9):1957-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21010.
9
Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial.接受放射外科手术或放射外科手术加全脑照射治疗的脑转移瘤患者的神经认知:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
10
Karnofsky performance status and lactate dehydrogenase predict the benefit of palliative whole-brain irradiation in patients with advanced intra- and extracranial metastases from malignant melanoma.卡氏功能状态评分和乳酸脱氢酶可预测姑息性全脑放疗对恶性黑色素瘤颅内和颅外广泛转移患者的获益。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and feasibility of cognitive assessments with adults with primary brain cancer and brain metastasis: A systematic review.对原发性脑癌和脑转移瘤成年患者进行认知评估的可接受性和可行性:一项系统综述。
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Dec 26;10(3):219-237. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac097. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Crossroads of parental decision making: Intersections of hope, communication, relationships, and emotions.父母决策的十字路口:希望、沟通、关系和情感的交集。
J Child Health Care. 2023 Jun;27(2):300-315. doi: 10.1177/13674935211059041. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Identifying gaps in consumer health library collections: a retrospective review.

本文引用的文献

1
Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.晚期癌症患者的信息提供与决策制定:一项系统综述
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Nov;61(10):2252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015.
2
Communication and the patient/physician relationship: a phenomenological inquiry.沟通与医患关系:一项现象学探究
J Support Oncol. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):206-15.
3
What do patients receiving palliative care for cancer and their families want to be told? A Canadian and Australian qualitative study.接受癌症姑息治疗的患者及其家属希望被告知什么?一项加拿大和澳大利亚的定性研究。
识别消费者健康图书馆馆藏中的空白:回顾性研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):656-666. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.895.
4
Pre-treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: what do we know and what can we learn from other disciplines? A systematic review of qualitative studies.脊柱转移瘤患者的治疗前预期:我们了解什么,我们能从其他学科学到什么?一项定性研究的系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07683-7.
5
Informational needs of brain metastases patients and their caregivers.脑转移瘤患者及其照料者的信息需求。
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):47-60. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy008. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
6
A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.放射肿瘤学中共同决策与患者决策辅助工具的综述
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):238-245. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1169-8.
7
Informational and Supportive Care Needs of Brain Metastases Patients and Caregivers: a Systematic Review.脑转移患者及照料者的信息与支持性护理需求:一项系统综述
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Dec;32(4):914-923. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1030-5.
8
Celebrating 10 Years of Undergraduate Medical Education: A Student-Centered Evaluation of the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre--Determinants of Community Health Year 2 Program.庆祝本科医学教育十周年:玛格丽特公主癌症中心以学生为中心的评估——社区健康年度2计划的决定因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0674-2.
9
Managing brain metastases patients with and without radiotherapy: initial lessonsfrom a team-based consult service through a multidisciplinary integrated palliative oncology clinic.管理有放疗和无放疗脑转移患者:多学科综合姑息肿瘤学临床中基于团队的咨询服务的初步经验。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1917-1. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
10
Informational stories: a complementary strategy for patients and caregivers with brain metastases.信息故事:脑转移患者和照护者的补充策略。
Curr Oncol. 2009 May;16(3):33-9. doi: 10.3747/co.v16i3.397.
BMJ. 2004 Jun 5;328(7452):1343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38103.423576.55. Epub 2004 May 19.
4
Individual empowerment among Chinese cancer patients in Hong Kong.中国香港癌症患者的个人赋权
West J Nurs Res. 2004 Feb;26(1):59-75; discussion 76-84. doi: 10.1177/0193945903259037.
5
Hope for the best, and prepare for the worst.抱最好的希望,做最坏的打算。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):791-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00021.
6
Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes.姑息性癌症治疗中以患者为中心的决策:一个充满矛盾的世界。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00079-x.
7
Assessing decision-making capacity in the setting of palliative care research.在姑息治疗研究背景下评估决策能力。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Apr;25(4):S6-13. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00097-6.
8
A review of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases.立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Apr;2(2):105-10. doi: 10.1177/153303460300200205.
9
More than just a pamphlet: development of an innovative computer-based education program for cancer patients.不仅仅是一本小册子:为癌症患者开发的创新型计算机辅助教育项目
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Sep;44(3):271-81. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00204-4.
10
Sharing decisions in cancer care.癌症护理中的共同决策。
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1865-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00303-8.