Ryan Suzanne, Bonilha Leonardo, Jackson Stephen R
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0379-9. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular technique that can be used to investigate the functional role of specific cortical areas with reference to a particular behavioural task. Single-cell recording studies performed in non-human primates have demonstrated that a region of the parietal lobe known as the lateral intraparietal area is specialized in the planning and control of saccadic eye movements. The homologue of this area in humans is termed the parietal eye fields (PEF) and its role in relation to saccades has previously been examined using TMS. In this paper individual variability in the functional effect of parietal TMS on the latency, amplitude and angular direction of visually-guided saccades has been assessed. By examining individual variability in the spatial distribution of scalp-based localization and brain surface anatomy and stereotaxic localizations of the PEF it was shown that the distances between the sites determined by these three methods were not negligible, which raises problems regarding the most reliable anatomical localization technique to use. An assessment of the effect of TMS on saccade metrics (latency, amplitude error and angular error) at a grid of locations over parietal cortex demonstrated a large amount of intra-individual variability in the site where TMS had most affected saccades, leading to the conclusion that there is individual variability in the functional effects of parietal TMS on saccade planning and execution. This study confirms the idea that it may be problematic to use a fixed scalp location for every participant in a study. It may in fact be more appropriate to determine TMS sites functionally on an individual basis if possible. This finding may guide further studies using TMS and saccade planning in order to optimize their capability to investigate this area and to draw meaningful biological conclusions.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种常用技术,可用于参照特定行为任务来研究特定皮质区域的功能作用。在非人类灵长类动物中进行的单细胞记录研究表明,顶叶的一个区域,即外侧顶内区,专门负责扫视眼动的计划和控制。人类中该区域的同源物被称为顶叶眼区(PEF),此前已使用TMS研究了其与扫视的关系。本文评估了顶叶TMS对视觉引导扫视的潜伏期、幅度和角度方向的功能影响的个体差异。通过检查基于头皮的定位、脑表面解剖结构以及PEF的立体定向定位在空间分布上的个体差异,结果表明这三种方法确定的位点之间的距离不可忽略,这就引发了关于使用最可靠的解剖定位技术的问题。对顶叶皮质上一系列位置处TMS对扫视指标(潜伏期、幅度误差和角度误差)的影响进行评估后发现,TMS对扫视影响最大的位点存在大量个体内差异,从而得出结论:顶叶TMS对扫视计划和执行的功能影响存在个体差异。这项研究证实了这样一种观点,即在研究中为每个参与者使用固定的头皮位置可能存在问题。如果可能的话,根据个体功能来确定TMS位点实际上可能更合适。这一发现可能会指导进一步使用TMS和扫视计划的研究,以优化其研究该区域的能力并得出有意义的生物学结论。